Site Loader

Abstraction

The ubiquitin proteasome system ( UPS ) maps to degrade unwanted proteins and its damage have been linked to Parkinson ‘s disease. UPS impairment leads to the accretion and collection of unwanted proteins as Lewy organic structures and Lewy neurites, doing dopaminergic neural decease in substantia nigger of the encephalon. Parkinson ‘s disease can be either familial or sporadic, with the former affecting familial factors while the latter involve a combination of both familial and environmental factors. Mutants in parkin, UCH-L1 ( ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 ) and a-synuclein cistrons will do UPS failure while mutants in cistrons such as PINK1 ( PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 ) , DJ-1 and LRRK2 ( leucine-rich repetition kinase 2 ) will do mitochondrial disfunction taking to UPS failure every bit good. All these mutants finally result in Parkinson ‘s disease. Similarly, environmental factors such as neurolysins, which include MPTP ( 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyridine ) and rotenone, and substances that induce aging will take to UPS failure and therefore Parkinson ‘s disease. Many surveies were done to research the function of UPS in Parkinson ‘s disease but even up till now, there is no concrete grounds in turn outing their association. Contradicting findings were found and the existent implicit in mechanism of how UPS damage can take to Parkinson ‘s disease is still non understood. Hence, current research needs to concentrate in deciding contradictions and to detect concrete grounds in turn outing the association of UPS failure with Parkinson ‘s disease.

Introduction

Parkinson ‘s disease is a common, progressive neurodegenerative disease discovered by James Parkinson in 1817 ( Inamdar et al, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) , dawdling merely behind Alzheimer ‘s disease ( Kay et al, 2007 ) . The symptoms include resting shudders, musculus rigidness and bradykinesia ( Robinson, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) . It was subsequently discovered that such symptoms were initiated by a gradual loss of dopaminergic nerve cells in the substantia nigra pars compacta of the encephalon ( Werner et al, 2008 ) , with the presence of Lewy organic structures and Lewy neurites in staying nerve cells ( Markesberg et al, 2009 ; Werner et Al, 2008 ) . Further surveies supported the fact that the loss of dopaminergic nerve cells, and therefore dopamine neural transmittal, are closely associated to the show of symptoms ( Werner et al, 2008 ) .

Approximately 90 % instances of Parkinson ‘s disease are sporadic but increasing surveies have shown possible nexus of the disease to familial factors, accounting for approximately 10 % of entire instances ( Robinson, 2008 ) . Normally, it is persons age 60 old ages & A ; above that succumb to sporadic Parkinson ‘s disease while autosomal dominant/ recessionary early-onset familial Parkinson ‘s disease affect persons of age 40 old ages and below ( Sironi et al, 2008 ) . There are instances of autosomal dominant late-onset Parkinson ‘s disease every bit good ( Robinson, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ) .

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

By and large, factors doing either familial or sporadic Parkinson ‘s disease are believed to impair the ubiquitin proteasome system ( UPS ) which consequences in damaging protein collection in the encephalon ( Lindsten et al, 2002 ) . Dopaminergic nerve cells were observed to be most vulnerable to such collection ( Robinson, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ; Cookson, 2004 ) . The UPS rely on 26S proteasome to degrade mark proteins/ substrates tagged by ubiquitin molecules and this regulative procedure involves many enzymes ( Ventii and Wilkinson, 2008 ) . A mutant in any of the UPS enzymes ( Shimura et al, 2001 ) or aim proteins/ substrates ( Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Ciechanover and Schwartz, 2004 ; Tanaka et Al, 2004 ) will forestall UPS from working decently, taking to protein collection and finally Parkinson ‘s disease. Deubiquitinating enzyme ( DUB ) , a type of UPS enzyme, acts as a binding spouse for 26S proteasome to let the recycling of ubiquitin for UPS to undergo continued tagging of other mark proteins ( Das et al, 2006 ) . There are many types of DUB and a mutant in any of them was observed to impair UPS excessively ( Ventii and Wilkinson, 2008 ; Ciechanover and Schwartz, 2004 ) .

In footings of familial Parkinson ‘s disease, the widely accepted events taking to it include the familial cistron mutant in parkin ( Sironi et al, 2008 ; Werner et Al, 2008 ) , UCH-L1 ( ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 ) ( Werner et al, 2008 ; Das et Al, 2006 ) and a-synuclein ( Das et al, 2006 ) that consequences in UPS failure. The theory of oxidative emphasis doing mitochondrial disfunction was besides proven to impair the ATP-dependent ( adenosine triphosphate-dependent ) UPS ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) , finally taking to Parkinson ‘s disease. For this theory, inherited cistron mutant in PINK1 ( PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 ) ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Robinson, 2008 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) , DJ-1 ( Werner et al, 2008 ) , parkin ( Robinson, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) or LRRK2 ( leucine-rich repetition kinase 2 ) ( Schlitter et al, 2006 ) can be involved.

In footings of sporadic Parkinson ‘s disease, it was observed to be caused by a combination of familial and environmental factors ( Inamdar et al, 2007 ; Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Dawson and Dawson, 2003 ) ensuing in UPS failure every bit good. The familial factors are self-generated mutant in cistrons such as parkin and a-synuclein. The environmental factors can be neurolysins or substances that induce aging ( Robinson, 2008 ; Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) .

All in all, the function of UPS in Parkinson ‘s disease has been an involvement to many research workers as increasing surveies have shown close association between UPS itself and Parkinson ‘s disease ( Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Tanaka et Al, 2004 ; Ciechanover and Brundin, 2003 ) . Assorted experiments were done to turn out that a certain familial or environmental factor will ensue in UPS failure and finally Parkinson ‘s disease ( Sironi et al, 2008 ; Werner et Al, 2008 ; Greene et Al, 2003 ) . However, there are merely beliing findings without any concrete find to day of the month. Further surveies are needed so as to decide the contradictions and to accomplish cognition of existent underlying mechanism for the function of UPS in Parkinson ‘s disease ( Werner et al, 2008 ) .

Ubiquitin Proteasome System and Parkinson ‘s Disease

The ubiquitin proteasome system ( UPS ) acts to take unwanted proteins from the organic structure by ubiquitination ( Shimura et al, 2001 ) . This procedure involves the tagging of mark protein with ubiquitin molecules and directing a signal to 26S proteasome for debasement ( Shimura et al, 2001 ) . The 26S proteasome is made up of a 20S nucleus atom and two 19S regulative atoms. A loss in either 20S or 19S atom was observed to cut down UPS activity ( McNaught et al, 2002 ) , therefore taking to Parkinson ‘s disease.

Many surveies indicated the nexus of UPS damage with Parkinson ‘s disease due to the formation of protein sums, doing dopaminergic neural decease ( Robinson, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ; Reinstein and Ciechanover, 2006 ) . UPS damage caused a chronic instability of misfolded proteins coevals and its devolution, taking to toxic protein collection in the signifier of Lewy organic structures and Lewy neurites, finally doing Parkinson ‘s disease ( Lindsten et al, 2002 ) .

Ubiquitination

Ubiquitination are divided into two phases: taging mark proteins with ubiquitin molecules and debasement of labeled proteins by 26S proteasome ( Shimura et al, 2001 ) . The ubiquitin proteasome system ( UPS ) consist three chief types of enzymes, viz. E1, E2 and E3. E1 is an ubiquitin-activating enzyme ; E2 is an ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme while E3 is an ubiquitin ligase ( Shimura et al, 2001 ) .

In the first phase, ubiquitin is activated by E1 and this activation requires ATP ( adenosine triphosphate ) for energy. The activated ubiquitin will be carried over to E2, organizing a complex. E3 will acknowledge the composite and catalyze the transportation of ubiquitin to the protein, of which an isopeptide bond is formed between them ( Tanaka et al, 2004 ) . The add-on of ubiquitin to the protein is repeated many times to finally organize a polyubiquitin concatenation ( Robinson, 2008 ; Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Ciechanover and Brundin, 2003 ) .

In the 2nd phase, the polyubiquinated protein will be degraded by 26S proteasome into smaller peptides ( Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Reinstein and Ciechanover, 2006 ; Ciechanover and Brundin, 2003 ) . The smaller peptides are farther degraded into aminic acids by peptidases ( Reinstein and Ciechanover, 2006 ; Ciechanover and Brundin, 2003 ) while deubiquitinating enzymes will renew free ubiquitin molecules from the tagged protein after its debasement ( Das et al, 2006 ) .

Mutants in Ubiquitin Proteasome System Enzymes or Target Proteins

The ubiquitin proteasome system ( UPS ) contains many enzymes including E1, E2, E3 and deubiquitinating enzymes to ease ubiquitination. Hence, a mutant in any of the enzymes ( Shimura et al, 2001 ) will forestall UPS from taking mark proteins, ensuing in protein collection that leads to dopaminergic neural decease and therefore, Parkinson ‘s disease ( Greene et Al, 2003 ) . Similarly, a mutant in mark proteins ( Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Ciechanover and Schwartz, 2004 ; Tanaka et Al, 2004 ) may forestall the UPS enzymes from recognizing their constructions, finally taking to UPS failure and therefore Parkinson ‘s disease as the enzymes can non ease the debasement of mark proteins ( Ciechanover and Schwartz, 2004 ; Ciechanover and Brundin, 2003 ) .

Lewy Bodies and Lewy Neurites

Failure of ubiquitin proteasome system ( UPS ) consequence in the accretion of protein sums in staying dopaminergic nerve cells in the signifier of Lewy organic structures and Lewy neurites as mark proteins can no longer be degraded by UPS ( Robinson, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) . Lewy organic structures and Lewy neurites is considered the most obvious signal screening that an single suffers from Parkinson ‘s disease ( Markesbery et al, 2009 ) . However, autosomal recessionary early-onset Parkinson ‘s disease has a deficiency of it ( Shimura et al, 2001 ) .

The presence of Lewy organic structures and Lewy neurites were believed to be damaging but there are opposing voices stating that they may really play a protective function as the cell divert toxic proteins to organize indissoluble inclusions, therefore forestalling the toxic proteins from destructing encephalon tissues ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Ciechanover and Schwartz, 2004 ) . Lewy organic structures and Lewy neurites are made up of many proteins, with a-synuclein being the major constituent ( Markesbery et al, 2009 ) . Other proteins include ubiquitin, proteasome fractional monetary units and substrates of parkin such as CDCrel-1 ( cell division control related-1 ) , Pael-R ( parkin-associated endothelial-like receptor ) , synphilin-1 ( Sun et al, 2007 ) and the glycosylated signifier of a-synuclein known as aSp22 ( Haywood and Staveley, 2004 ; Shimura et Al, 2001 ) .

Familial Parkinson ‘s Disease

Familial Parkinson ‘s disease is caused by familial factors and may impact the ubiquitination proteasome system ( UPS ) straight or indirectly. Genes impacting UPS straight include parkin ( Sironi et al, 2008 ; Werner et Al, 2008 ) , UCH-L1 ( ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 ) ( Werner et al, 2008 ; Das et Al, 2006 ) and a-synuclein ( Das et al, 2006 ) whereby a mutant in them will impair UPS since their merchandises are target proteins of UPS. Such mutants result in a loss of map as mark proteins can no longer be recognised by UPS enzymes and be degraded, taking to their accretion and collection in the encephalon doing dopaminergic neural decease ( Ciechanover and Schwartz, 2004 ; Ciechanover and Brundin, 2003 ) . Besides, merchandises of parkin, UCH-L1 and a-synuclein cistrons mark substances that can organize constituents of Lewy organic structures for ubiquitination. Therefore, the mutants will forestall their merchandises from aiming several substances for ubiquitination, taking to the formation of Lewy organic structures ( Shimura et al, 2001 ) . With it, there will be dopaminergic neural decease and finally Parkinson ‘s disease.

Genes impacting UPS indirectly include PINK1 ( PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 ) ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Robinson, 2008 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) , DJ-1 ( Werner et al, 2008 ) , parkin ( Robinson, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) and LRRK2 ( leucine-rich repetition kinase 2 ) ( Schlitter et al, 2006 ) whereby a mutant in them will take to oxidative emphasis and therefore mitochondrial disfunction, interrupting the production of ATP ( adenosine triphosphate ) . Without ATP, UPS can non work decently and therefore, can non degrade mark proteins taking to their accretion and collection ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) . This ultimately causes Parkinson ‘s disease every bit good.

Mutants in Parkin Gene

A mutant in parkin cistron, the most common familial factor doing Parkinson ‘s disease, will take to autosomal recessionary early-onset Parkinson ‘s disease ( Sironi et al, 2008 ; Shimura et Al, 2001 ) . Parkin cistron expresses parkin proteins which function as an ubiquitin ligase ( E3 ) in the ubiquitin proteasome system ( UPS ) ( Shimura et al, 2001 ) . Therefore, any mutant in parkin cistron will impair the operation of UPS.

Surveies observed that parkin protein plays a function in recognizing polyubiquinated proteins and helps in easing their debasement by adhering with the fractional monetary unit of 26S proteasome, Rpn10 ( besides known as S5a ) ( Sakata et al, 2003 ) . A mutant in parkin cistron cause the inability of such binding ( Robinson, 2008 ; Lim and Tan, 2007 ) and the cistron can non bring forth proper parkin proteins that recognise constructions of their mark proteins. Hence, parkin proteins can no longer execute its ligase activity, doing UPS failure ( Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) . This caused a damaging accretion of their mark proteins or even parkin proteins itself that consequence in dopaminergic neural decease and finally Parkinson ‘s disease ( Robinson, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ; Lim and Tan, 2007 ) . It was besides seen that parkin is neuroprotective as it can increase organic structure ‘s opposition against substances damaging to neural endurance ( Sun et al, 2007 ; Cookson, 2004 ) . Therefore, a mutant in parkin cistron will increase the exposure of nerve cells to toxins.

Parkin cistron can undergo many different mutants to finally do autosomal recessionary early-onset Parkinson ‘s disease. These include point mutants, exon omissions and exon generations ( Kay et al, 2007 ; Lincoln et Al, 2003 ) . The most common mutants occur in the RING-IBR ( in between RING ) -RING sphere of parkin cistron ( Lucking et al, 2000 ) . In a survey done by Sironi et Al on 150 human topics, nine point mutants of parkin cistron among other types of mutants were identified, two of which were novel. The survey besides saw that heterozygous mutant in parkin allelomorphs is adequate to do Parkinson ‘s disease ( Sironi et al, 2008 ) as supported by surveies done by other research workers ( Clark et Al, 2006 ; Schlitter et Al, 2006 ; Oliveria et Al, 2003 ) . However, some other research workers rebutted this thought as they observed heterozygous parkin point mutants in persons without Parkinson ‘s disease excessively ( Kay et al, 2007 ; Lincoln et Al, 2003 ) .

To turn out that a mutant in parkin cistron does do Parkinson ‘s disease, many surveies were done on animate being theoretical accounts as good. Experiments done on parkin smasher mice to impair UPS observed no devolution of dopaminergic nerve cells ( Palacino et al, 2004 ) though the mice displayed Parkinsonian-like symptoms ( Palacino et al, 2004 ; Itier et Al, 2003 ) and decreased Dopastat transporters to uptake Dopastat ( Tanaka et al, 2004 ) which may explicate the induction of symptoms. The fact that dopaminergic nerve cells were non loss in such parkin knockout mice experiments where UPS is impaired is non in melody with the stating that parkin mutants will take to dopaminergic neural loss and therefore Parkinson ‘s disease ( Perez and Palmiter, 2005 ; Goldberg et Al, 2003 ; Itier et Al, 2003 ) .

Experiments look intoing parkin smasher Drosophila melanogaster nevertheless, did detect Drosophila melanogaster with dopaminergic nerve cells devolution as their ensuing consequence together with the symptoms of Parkinson ‘s disease ( Cha et al, 2005 ; Whitworth et Al, 2005 ; Greene et Al, 2003 ) . Therefore, the existent implicit in mechanism of parkin mutants taking to UPS failure and therefore Parkinson ‘s disease is still non concrete plenty. There is a demand for farther research to warrant this issue, particularly on the cause of dopaminergic neural decease.

Mutants in UCH-L1 ( ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 ) Gene

UCH-L1 ( ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 ) protein, the merchandise of UCH-L1 cistron, is a type of deubiquitinating enzyme in the ubiquitin proteasome system ( UPS ) ( Nishikawa et al, 2003 ; Leroy et Al, 1998 ) assisting to recycle free ubiquitin molecules ( Das et al, 2006 ) . Therefore, any mutant within UCH-L1 cistron will impair UPS. Beside its hydrolase ( deubiquitinating ) activity, UCH-L1 can besides execute ligase activity but this occurs merely during its dimeric province ( Das et al, 2006 ; Nishikawa et Al, 2003 ) . During its monomeric province, it can merely execute hydrolase activity. UCH-L1 ligase activity acts to add ubiquitin to the already-formed polyubiquitin concatenation alternatively of catalyzing the first add-on of ubiquitin to aim proteins ( Ciechanover and Schwartz, 2004 ; Ciechanover and Brundin, 2003 ) .

It was foremost discovered from a German household that a type of missense mutant in UCH-L1 cistron, I93M ( Das et al, 2006 ; Leroy et Al, 1998 ) , will take to autosomal dominant Parkinson ‘s disease ( Das et al, 2006 ; Shimura et Al, 2001 ) as found in two siblings in the German household ( Leroy et al, 1998 ) . Surveies reported that I93M mutant resulted in reduced UCH-L1 hydrolase activity ( Nishikawa et al, 2003 ; Leroy et Al, 1998 ) . With it, there will be less regeneration of ubiquitin molecules to let continued procedure of ubiquitination on other mark proteins. Hence, UPS will be impaired and mark proteins will roll up and aggregate to organize Lewy organic structures and Lewy neurites, doing dopaminergic neural decease and finally Parkinson ‘s disease ( Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ; Reinstein and Ciechanover, 2006 ) . An addition in ligase activity was observed in I93M mutant excessively ( Ciechanover and Schwartz, 2004 ; Ciechanover and Brundin, 2003 ) .

Interestingly, another type of mutant in UCH-L1 cistron, S18Y, was observed to protect an person against Parkinson ‘s disease ( Das et al, 2006 ; Healy et Al, 2006 ; Nishikawa et Al, 2003 ) . The S18Y mutant greatly reduced the ligase activity of UCH-L1 while increasing its hydrolase activity ( Nishikawa et al, 2003 ) . However, it is still non cognize how these alterations can protect an person from Parkinson ‘s disease. More research is needed to be done to better understand S18Y mutant. However, it was seen that a lessening in hydrolase activity or an addition in ligase activity ( unnatural UPS operation ) can ensue in Parkinson ‘s disease as deduced from I93M and S18Y mutants.

To look into whether hydrolase activity of UCH-L1 does play a function in doing Parkinson ‘s disease, an experiment was done to demobilize UCH-L1 cistron in mice, therefore forbiding UPS from working decently ( Das et al, 2006 ) . The mice, nevertheless, did non expose symptoms of Parkinson ‘s disease but instead, Gracile Axonal Dystrophy syndrome as its ensuing consequence ( Das et al, 2006 ) . This contradicts the treatment earlier that a lessening in hydrolase activity in UCH-L1 will take to Parkinson ‘s disease, therefore conveying back the inquiry of whether a mutant in UCH-L1 cistron will do Parkinson ‘s disease or non.

Some research workers questioned the nexus between UCH-L1 cistron and Parkinson ‘s disease as their research has found no association. One such survey did proteasome analysis on substantia nigger of persons enduring from Parkinson ‘s disease and persons that were healthy when alive ( Werner et al, 2008 ) . It was observed that the look of UCH-L1 between encephalons of morbid and healthy persons showed no important difference, as supported by another survey utilizing proteasome analysis every bit good ( Basso et al, 2004 ) . Furthermore, the mutant found in the two German siblings was the lone instance of I93M mutant in UCH-L1 cistron boulder clay now ( Healy et al, 2006 ) . With it, more extended research affecting carnal theoretical accounts or human topics are needed to better reason the nexus between UCH-L1 cistron mutants, and therefore the function in UPS failure, with Parkinson ‘s disease.

Mutants in a-synuclein Gene

The a-synuclein cistron, which expresses a-synuclein protein, will take to autosomal dominant Parkinson ‘s disease when mutated ( Shimura et al, 2001 ) . Bing the major constituent of Lewy organic structures, the function of a-synuclein in doing Parkinson ‘s disease is deemed important ( Markesbery et al, 2009 ) . Though there is no concrete cognition on the maps of a-synuclein, it was believed to play a function in the proper operation of nerve cells ( Inamdar et al, 2007 ; Cookson, 2004 ) and in modulating dopamine neurotransmission ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ) .

Two chief types of a-synuclein cistron mutants were identified which include cistron locus generations, and missense mutants viz. A30P, A53T and E46K ( Inamdar et al, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ; Cookson, 2004 ) . These mutants increase the susceptibleness of a-synuclein proteins to aggregate as toxic filaments or protofibrils and it is this signifiers of a-synuclein that integrate into Lewy organic structures ( Lee and Lee, 2002 ) . Such collection will impair the ubiquitin proteasome system ( UPS ) by suppressing its activity, ensuing in the accretion and collection of other proteins targeted by UPS ( Lindersson et al, 2004 ) .

An experiment observed that aggregative a-synuclein will interact with the 19S atom of 26S proteasome, therefore suppressing its map to degrade mark proteins of UPS ( Synder et al, 2003 ) . Hence, there will be an collection of such proteins taking to dopaminergic neural decease and finally Parkinson ‘s disease.

To further turn out that a mutant in a-synuclein cistron will do Parkinson ‘s disease, surveies were done on animate being theoretical accounts ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ; Cookson, 2004 ) . Over-expression of a-synuclein was observed to do UPS suppression, therefore diminishing its ability to take unwanted proteins ( Sun et al, 2005 ; Tanaka et Al, 2001 ) . Extra surveies look intoing over-expression of normal and mutant a-synuclein in mice and Drosophila melanogaster besides observed the attendant effects as dopaminergic neural decease, Parkinson ‘s disease symptoms and formation of inclusions that include a-synuclein ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Dawson and Dawson, 2003 ) .

However, other surveies could non turn out that a-synuclein cistron mutants will ensue in Parkinson ‘s disease symptoms and dopaminergic neural decease ( Sun et al, 2007 ; Cookson, 2004 ; Dawson and Dawson, 2003 ) . In add-on, it is still non clear whether ubiquitination does ease the debasement of a-synuclein and whether impaired UPS will truly take to the development of Parkinson ‘s disease ( Ciechanover and Schwartz, 2004 ; Ciechanover and Brundin, 2003 ) . Therefore, a batch more research is needed to be done in order to confirm the nexus between a-synuclein cistron mutants and Parkinson ‘s disease, particularly on the engagement of UPS.

Mitochondrial Dysfunction

The theory of oxidative emphasis ensuing in mitochondrial disfunction, therefore interrupting the production of ATP ( adenosine triphosphate ) was justified by many research workers to impair the ATP-dependent ubiquitin proteasome system ( UPS ) ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Robinson, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ) . As UPS requires ATP as its energy beginning during ubiquitination, failure to bring forth ATP will forestall UPS from working decently. Hence, UPS can non degrade mark proteins taking to their accretion and collection. This causes dopaminergic neural decease and finally, Parkinson ‘s disease ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Robinson, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ) .

The cistrons involved in this theory include PINK1 ( PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 ) ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Robinson, 2008 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) , DJ-1 ( Werner et al, 2008 ) , parkin ( Robinson, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) and LRRK2 ( leucine-rich repetition kinase 2 ) ( Schlitter et al, 2006 ) whereby a mutant in them will take to mitochondrial disfunction.

PINK1 cistron mutants cause autosomal recessionary early-onset Parkinson ‘s disease ( Reinstein and Ciechanover, 2006 ; Cookson, 2004 ) . PINK1 protein, the merchandise of PINK1 cistron, is a mitochondrial kinase ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Robinson, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ) that functions to increase the opposition of chondriosomes against UPS suppression and besides plays a function in stress response ( Inamdar et al, 2007 ) . Therefore, a mutant in PINK1 cistron will take its protection on chondriosomes, increasing the hazard of UPS suppression and finally ensue in a negative impact whereby there will be no production of ATP to guarantee proper UPS operation. This leads to the accretion and collection of UPS mark proteins and dopaminergic neural decease ( Park et Al, 2006 ) doing Parkinson ‘s disease. Likewise, PINK1 cistron mutants will take to mitochondrial disfunction, thereby interrupting the production of ATP for UPS as PINK1 can no longer response to antagonize oxidative emphasis ( Irvine et al, 2008 ) . It was besides observed that PINK1 acts to modulate HtrA2, a type of mitochondrial enzyme, and a mutant in PINK1 cistron will take to decreased mitochondrial processing by HtrA2 ( Robinson, 2008 ) . However, the exact mechanism of how PINK1 can forestall mitochondrial disfunction is still ill-defined ( Inamdar et al, 2007 ) .

Similarly, mutants in DJ-1 cistron can do autosomal recessionary early-onset Parkinson ‘s disease ( Meulener et al, 2005 ) . DJ-1 protein, the merchandise of DJ-1 cistron, is a homodimeric mitochondrial protein ( Robinson, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ; Cookson, 2004 ) moving as a chaperone and was observed to forestall a-synuclein collection ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Robinson, 2008 ; Cookson, 2004 ) . DJ-1 protein is besides believed to be an antioxidant that protects chondriosomes against damaging effects of oxidative emphasis ( Moore et Al, 2005 ) . A mutant in DJ-1 cistron will no longer forestall the collection of a-synuclein, therefore leting this effect to impair UPS and finally leads to Parkinson ‘s disease. DJ-1 cistron mutants besides lead to its merchandise instability and will be degraded by UPS ( Meulener et al, 2005 ; Moore et Al, 2005 ) , therefore increasing the hazard of chondriosomes to be damaged by oxidative emphasis ( Moore et Al, 2005 ) . This was supported by a survey look intoing the effects of DJ-1 smasher mice ( Cookson, 2004 ) . However, a survey which did proteasome analysis on substantia nigger of morbid and healthy human topics observed that the look of DJ-1 between the two groups displayed no important difference ( Werner et al, 2008 ) as agreed by similar analysis done by Basso et Al ( Basso et al, 2004 ) . This contradicts the initial idea that DJ-1 cistron mutants will do Parkinson ‘s disease.

For parkin proteins, it was seen that it can interact with PINK1 proteins ( Park et Al, 2006 ) and DJ-1 proteins ( Meulener et al, 2005 ; Moore et Al, 2005 ) to modulate the construction and maps of chondriosomes. With it, a mutant in parkin cistron, which expresses parkin protein, can ensue in mitochondrial disfunction ( Park et Al, 2006 ) as the proper construction and maps of chondriosomes can non be maintained. This leads to cut down ATP production, therefore impairing UPS. This causes the accretion and collection of its mark proteins, taking to dopaminergic neural decease and therefore Parkinson ‘s disease.

Different from PINK1 and DJ-1 cistron mutants, a mutant in LRRK2 cistron will take to autosomal dominant early-onset Parkinson ‘s disease ( Inamdar et al, 2007 ) . Although the exact map of LRRK2, which is a kinase ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ) is non known, it was believed to be a mark protein for ubiquitination by parkin in the UPS ( Smith et Al, 2005 ) . Over-expression of LRRK2 will take to its collection ( Smith et Al, 2005 ) that may transcend the ability of UPS to take it. Mutants in LRRK2 cistron is besides believed to do mitochondrial disfunction ( Sun et al, 2007 ) . However, the existent implicit in mechanism of how LRRK2 mutants can do the development of Parkinson ‘s disease is still ill-defined ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ) .

It was seen that for the theory of oxidative emphasis taking to mitochondrial disfunction, a great trade of research is still needed to firmly reason the relationship of mitochondrial disfunction with Parkinson ‘s disease. Mutants in PINK1, DJ-1, parkin or LRRK2 cistrons doing mitochondrial disfunction, taking to UPS failure and dopaminergic neural decease, therefore finally Parkinson ‘s disease requires more concrete grounds to back up their association ( Cookson, 2004 ; Dawson and Dawson, 2003 ) .

Sporadic Parkinson ‘s Disease

Sporadic Parkinson ‘s disease is the most frequently-occurred type of Parkinson ‘s disease ( Itier et al, 2003 ) , accounting for approximately 90 % of entire instances ( Robinson, 2008 ) . It was observed to be caused by a combination of familial and environmental factors ( Inamdar et al, 2007 ; Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Dawson and Dawson, 2003 ) that can take to mitochondrial disfunction and UPS failure, doing dopaminergic neural decease. The familial factors are as mentioned earlier which include mutants in parkin, a-synuclein and DJ-1 cistrons. The lone difference is that they are self-generated mutant alternatively of being inherited. The environmental factors can be neurolysins or any substances that induces aging ( Robinson, 2008 ; Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) .

Neurotoxins

There are many neurolysins that can bring on ubiquitin proteasome system ( UPS ) failure and finally leads to Parkinson ‘s disease, normally with the engagement of mitochondrial disfunction. MPTP ( 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyridine ) ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Robinson, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ) , pesticides ( Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) , 6-OHDA ( 6-hydroxyl Dopastat ) ( Inamdar et al, 2007 ; Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) and heavy metals ( Inamdar et al, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) are all neurolysins moving as environmental factors that can do sporadic Parkinson ‘s disease.

MPTP ( 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyridine )

MPTP is a mitochondrial composite I inhibitor which undergo oxidization to organize MPP+ ion inside the organic structure and is taken up by Dopastat transporters, roll uping itself in the dopaminergic nerve cells ( Fornai et al, 2005 ; Greenamyre et Al, 2003 ) . Such accretion of MPP+ causes mitochondrial disfunction and oxidative emphasis within dopaminergic nerve cells, taking to neural decease ( Irvine et al, 2008 ; Inamdar et Al, 2007 ) . UPS will be affected due to less ATP ( adenine triphosphate ) production by chondriosomes and besides, due to increased misfolded proteins coevals caused by oxidative emphasis ( Hoglinger et al, 2003 ) . These prevent UPS from taking unwanted proteins expeditiously and therefore, lead to their collection doing dopaminergic neural decease and finally Parkinson ‘s disease.

Surveies affecting carnal theoretical accounts observed that MPTP resulted in the show of Parkinson ‘s disease symptoms ( Greenamyre et al, 2003 ) , dopaminergic neural decease ( Fornai et al, 2005 ; Ved et Al, 2005 ) , formation of inclusions ( Fornai et al, 2005 ) and suppression of UPS ( Fornai et al, 2005 ) . Surveies had besides observed the relationship between MPTP and a-synuclein whereby a-synuclein is needed to let MPTP to diminish UPS activity and cause dopaminergic neural decease ( Fornai et al, 2005 ) . However, farther research needs to be done in analyzing the formation of inclusion organic structures due to the presence of MPTP as it is non known whether such inclusions do stand for Lewy organic structures and Lewy neurites ( Fornai et al, 2005 ; Greenamyre et Al, 2003 ) . In add-on, MPTP was seen to do the inaction and unsolvability of parkin that threatens the neuroprotective function of parkin ( Wang et al, 2005 ) . This consequence in the collection of parkin ( Wang et al, 2005 ) and damage of UPS since parkin Acts of the Apostless as an E3 in the UPS, taking to the development of Parkinson ‘s disease.

Pesticides

There are three chief types of pesticides, viz. rotenone, paraquat and dieldrin which act as a neurolysin, doing sporadic Parkinson ‘s disease. Rotenone is a mitochondrial composite I inhibitor ( Wang et al, 2006 ; Fornai et Al, 2005 ) which enters the encephalon tissues doing mitochondrial disfunction, therefore suppressing UPS due to decreased production of ATP from the chondriosome ( Hoglinger et al, 2003 ) . Effectss of rotenone are really much alike those of MPTP which include the show of Parkinson ‘s disease symptoms ( Fornai et al, 2005 ; Greenamyre et Al, 2003 ) , dopaminergic neural decease ( Greenamyre et al, 2003 ) , formation of inclusions ( Fornai et al, 2005 ; Greenamyre et Al, 2003 ; Hoglinger et Al, 2003 ) and suppression of UPS ( Wang et al, 2006 ; Fornai et Al, 2005 ; Wang et Al, 2005 ) . A survey observed that dopaminergic nerve cells of substantia niggers are peculiarly susceptible to mitochondrial complex I inhibition despite the fact that rotenone induced the same degree of mitochondrial suppression throughout the whole encephalon ( Greenamyre et al, 2003 ) . It was besides seen from a survey that together with an over-expression of a-synuclein, rotenone can greatly devolve dopaminergic nerve cells ( Ved et al, 2005 ) . Rotenone, excessively, can do the inaction and unsolvability of parkin that threatens the neuroprotective function of parkin ( Wang et al, 2005 ) and its ligase activity, therefore impairing UPS.

Paraquat, whose construction has near resemblance to that of MPTP, is another pesticide moving as a neurolysin that can do sporadic Parkinson ‘s disease ( McCormack et al, 2002 ; Brooks et Al, 1999 ) . Effectss of paraquat include Parkinsonian-like syndromes, oxidative emphasis, dopaminergic neural decease ( McCormack et al, 2002 ; Brooks et Al, 1999 ) , UPS suppression ( Wang et al, 2005 ) and a-synuclein collection ( Manning-Bog et Al, 2002 ; McCormack et Al, 2002 ) . Oxidative emphasis was observed to do dopaminergic neural decease ( McCormack et al, 2002 ; Brooks et Al, 1999 ) , therefore ensuing in symptoms similar to that of Parkinson ‘s disease. In add-on, a survey exposing mice to paraquat observed an increased degree of a-synuclein aggregating in the encephalon ( Manning-Bog et Al, 2002 ) . Such collection of a-synuclein will impair UPS as discussed earlier, finally doing Parkinson ‘s disease. Paraquat besides caused inaction and unsolvability of parkin that threatens the neuroprotective function of parkin ( Wang et al, 2005 ) and its ligase activity, therefore impairing UPS. However, the underlying mechanism of paraquat doing neural decease requires more research and concrete grounds as there are inconsistent findings from assorted surveies ( McCormack et al, 2002 ) .

Dieldrin, besides a pesticide, was believed to do dopaminergic neural decease, oxidative emphasis which resulted in mitochondrial disfunction, UPS suppression and a-synuclein collection ( Sun et al, 2007 ) . Research showed the significance of dieldrin in doing sporadic Parkinson ‘s disease as surveies comparing dieldrin degrees in healthy and Parkinson ‘s disease brains displayed a immense difference, with a higher degrees in the morbid encephalons ( Sun et al, 2007 ) . Presently, the exact mechanism of dieldrin in doing sporadic Parkinson ‘s disease is still ill-defined. Hence, farther research has to be done to confirm this relationship.

6-OHDA ( 6-hydroxyl Dopastat )

6-OHDA is a neurolysin, with construction somehow resembling Dopastat ( Sun et al, 2007 ) , which will bring on oxidative emphasis ( Vercammen et al, 2006 ; Wang et Al, 2005 ) doing the damage of UPS. Surveies observed that initial exposure of 6-OHDA will increase the activity of UPS ( Hoglinger et al, 2003 ) so as to take misfolded proteins resulted from oxidative emphasis. It was merely when the oxidative emphasis intensified that will do UPS damage ( Hoglinger et al, 2003 ) as UPS can non take such unwanted proteins fast plenty ( Vercammen et al, 2006 ) , taking to their accretion and collection. This will so consequences in dopaminergic neural loss ( Vercammen et al, 2006 ; Hoglinger et Al, 2003 ) and finally Parkinson ‘s disease.

Similarly, parkin protects dopaminergic nerve cells against toxins and this protective function is jeopardised by 6-OHDA, doing its inaction and unsolvability ( Vercammen et al, 2006 ; Wang et Al, 2005 ) . With it, the ligase activity of parkin will be loss and there will be an collection of parkin ( Wang et al, 2005 ) , taking to UPS failure and dopaminergic neural decease. However, a survey did non detect dopaminergic neural decease when mice were treated with 6-OHDA ( Perez et al, 2005 ) . Hence, there should be more surveies on 6-OHDA to get its existent mechanisms in doing neural decease and Parkinson ‘s disease. The function played by UPS in developing Parkinson ‘s disease due to 6-OHDA exposure needs more concrete grounds excessively.

Heavy Metallic elements

Heavy metals such as Fe, manganese and Cu were believed to play a function in doing sporadic Parkinson ‘s disease, with Fe being the most common ( Inamdar et al, 2007 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ) . By and large, heavy metals were observed to do a-synuclein collection ( Sun et al, 2007 ) , taking to UPS damage and finally Parkinson ‘s disease. In peculiar, iron consequences in oxidative emphasis taking to UPS damage besides its ability to do a-synuclein collection ( Sun et al, 2007 ) . Iron was seen to do dopaminergic neural decease excessively. Research analyzing the presence of Fe in substantia nigger observed a higher degree of Fe in Parkinson ‘s disease brains as compared to healthy encephalons ( Inamdar et al, 2007 ) . However, it is still ill-defined whether an addition in Fe is the existent cause of dopaminergic neural decease or whether it is merely a byproduct of deceasing dopaminergic nerve cells. Additional research is needed to warrant its implicit in mechanism. Interestingly, Fe besides caused the inaction and unsolvability of parkin that threatens the neuroprotective function of parkin, taking to parkin collection ( Wang et al, 2005 ) and therefore impairing UPS.

Another type of heavy metal, Mn, was observed to do Parkinsonian-like symptoms and dopaminergic neural decease besides a-synuclein collection ( Sun et al, 2007 ) . Surveies observed that Mn is dependent on a-synuclein in bring oning its toxic effects on cells ( Sun et al, 2007 ) . Similarly, manganese can endanger the neuroprotective function of parkin by changing its activity and solubility ( Wang et al, 2005 ) . To day of the month, there is still non much extended research on Mns in doing Parkinson ‘s disease. Therefore, more work can be done in this country to confirm the nexus by happening more concrete grounds.

Aging

Aging is another factor that can ensue in sporadic Parkinson ‘s disease ( Lim and Tan, 2007 ; Ciechanover and Brundin, 2003 ) . It is a natural procedure but in the environment, there are substances that can rush up aging. Aging was seen to diminish the ability of ubiquitin proteasome system ( UPS ) in taking unwanted proteins ( Zeng et al, 2005 ) , therefore doing their accretion and collection. Aging excessively cut down organic structure ‘s opposition against oxidative emphasis, ensuing in a higher degree of misfolded proteins coevals that exceed UPS ‘s ability to take them ( Robinson, 2008 ; Sun et Al, 2007 ; Ciechanover and Brundin, 2003 ) . All these leads to dopaminergic neural decease, particularly elderly nerve cells as they are more vulnerable to such collection ( Robinson, 2008 ) , and finally Parkinson ‘s disease.

One specific survey utilizing immature and old animate being theoretical accounts observed that the activities of UPS in older animate being theoretical accounts were much lower than that of their younger opposite numbers, particularly in the substantia nigger ( Zeng et al, 2005 ) . This farther proves that aging will diminish the ability of UPS in taking unwanted proteins, taking to dopaminergic neural decease. Additionally, aging was seen to do unsolvability of parkin ( Wang et al, 2005 ; Pawlyk et Al, 2003 ) , therefore taking the neuroprotective function of parkin. This will take to UPS damage, dopaminergic neural decease and finally Parkinson ‘s disease as discussed earlier.

Decision

In decision, the ubiquitin proteasome system ( UPS ) plays a important function in Parkinson ‘s disease as UPS damage was seen to ever do nigral dopaminergic neural decease and finally, Parkinson ‘s disease. However, surveies on the familial or environmental factors gave beliing findings and there is non much cognition on the existent implicit in mechanisms in doing Parkinson ‘s disease, particularly in the engagement of UPS. Hence, current research needs to supply concrete grounds in deciding such contradictions and to understand the exact mechanisms of the causes of Parkinson ‘s disease.

Post Author: admin

x

Hi!
I'm Tamara!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out