Site Loader

1.1 What are Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes?

A Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube ( SWNT ) is a one-atom thick sheet of black lead ( called graphene ) rolled up into a seamless cylinder capped by semi-fullerene type caps at both terminals, with diameter typically in the scope of 1-2 nm [ 1 ] . 2.1 shows the peal of graphene to organize a Single Walled Carbon Nanotube, and the construction of a capped SWNT is shown in 2.2. Typical lengths of the SWNTs are in the micron scope, which makes the length-to-diameter ratio exceed 10,000.

Following the find of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes ( MWNTs ) in 1991 [ 3 ] , Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes ( SWNTs ) were foremost reported by the IBM and NEC groups in dorsum to endorse documents published in the diary of Nature in 1993 [ 4, 5 ] . The IBM and NEC groups each found that passage metals co-vaporized with C catalyze the formation of SWNTs with a narrow scope of diameters around 0.7 nanometers to 1.6 nanometers. Cobalt was used as accelerator at IBM and Fe at NEC.

Depending on ue to the difference of constructions, which result from different wrapping angles, SWNTs can be divided into three types, zigzag, armchair and chiral. As Sshown in 2.3, if two sites are overlapped by wrapping, the wrapper vector C, which defines the comparative location of the two sites, is specified by a brace of whole numbers ( n, m ) that relate C to the two unit vectors a1 and a2.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

tungsten When N peers m, I? = 30A° , and an ‘armchair ‘ tubing will be constructed, . hHowever, in the instance when m = 0, Q = 0A° , and the formed tubing formed is a ‘zigzag ‘ tubing, shown in 2.3. Both armchair and zigzag SWNTs are achiral in that they are superimposable ontheir mirror image. All other tubings are of the ‘chiral ‘ type and have a finite wrapper angle I? with value 0A° & lt ; I? & lt ; 30A° [ 6-9 ] . The categorization of SWNTs is shown in 2.4.

For a C nanotube defined by the index ( n, m ) , the diameter, vitamin D, and the chiral angle, I? , are given by Equation 2.2 and 2.3, where B is the distance between neighbouring C atoms in the level sheet [ 9 ] , . usually Normally either 0.142 nanometer or 0.144 nanometers have been used in literature for computations [ refs ] .

The se theoretical computations have besides been provedvalidity of these looks has been confirmed by Scaning Burrowing Microscopy ( STM ) , by which non merely the diameter of the tubings can be determined, but besides the chirality of the tubing can be seen clearly. 2.6 [ 6 ] shows the atomically resolved STM images of single single-walled C nanotubes. The lattice on the surface of the cylinders allows a clear designation of the tubing chirality. From the image, it can easy be seen that tubes no. 10, 11 and 1 are chiral, whereas tubes no. 7 and 8 have a zigzag and armchair construction, severally. Tube no. 10 has a chiral angle ?¤ = 7A° and a diameter vitamin D = 1.3 nanometer, which corresponds to the a ( 11, 7 ) type of graphene sheetSWNT. A hexangular lattice is plotted on top of image no. 8 to clear up the non-chiral armchair construction [ 6 ] .

The chirality of the C nanotube has important deductions on the stuff belongingss. In peculiar, tube chirality is known to hold a strong impact on the electronic belongingss of the C nanotubes. Calculations [ 11 ] have predicted that when ( n – m ) mod 3 = 0, the tubings are metallic, otherwise semiconducting when ( n – m ) mod 3 = 1 or 2, with an energy spread of the order of ~ 0.5eV [ 6 ] . If the distribution of the structural vector in the tubing is unvarying, 1/3 of the tubings will be metallic and the staying 2/3 semiconducting [ 12 ] .

2.1 Why are SWNTs so interesting?

The particular constructions of SWNTs assure first-class optical [ 13 ] , mechanical [ 14 ] , electrical [ 15, 16 ] and thermic belongingss [ 17, 18 ] which would render them of great involvement for a scope of possible applications in many Fieldss [ 19 ] .

AlTthough the SWNTs were foremost reported in 1993 [ 4, 5 ] , the rresearch on their physical belongingss truly took off after 1995, when Richard Smalley ‘s group in Rice Uuniversity found a optical maser extirpation technique that could bring forth SWNTs at a output of up to 80 % alternatively of the few per centum outputs of earlyier experiments methods [ 20 ] . Since so, the mechanical and electronic belongingss and the corresponding applications have been widely studied.

1.1.1 Electronic belongingss

Most electrical music directors can be classified as either metals or semiconducting materials. However, graphene itself is a really unusual stuff, and as it is one of the rare stuffs known as a semimetal, finely balanced in the transitional zone between the two. The electrical belongingss of different stuffs are illustrated schematically in 2.7 [ 21 ] .

The electrical belongingss of a material depend on the separation between the aggregation of energy provinces that are filled by negatrons ( ruddy ) and the extra “ conductivity ” provinces that are empty and available for negatrons to skip into ( light blue ) . Metallic elements conduct electricity easy because there are so many negatrons with easy entree to adjacent conductivity provinces. In semiconducting materials, negatrons need an energy encouragement from visible radiation or an electrical field to leap the spread to the first available conductivity province. The signifier of C known as black lead is a semimetal that merely hardly behaviors, because without these external encouragements, merely a few negatrons can entree the narrow way to a conductivity province [ 21, 22 ] .

Because graphene has alone electronic belongingss, the tubesSWNTs, formed from graphenegrapheme, besides have such interesting belongingss, and can be either metallic or semiconducting.

2.2.2 Mechanical belongingss

The C atoms of a individual sheet of graphite signifier a planar honeycomb lattice, in which each atom is connected via a strong sp2 I? bond to three neighbouring atoms. Related to the sp2 bond strength, the basal plane elastic modulus of black lead is one of the largest of any known stuff, with a value of ~1020 GPa [ 23 ] . For this ground, the seamless cylindrical graphitic constructions of SWNTs are expected to hold many alone mechanical belongingss [ 24-28 ] , including a high Young ‘s modulus and a low specific weight. The yYoung ‘s modulus of SWNTs have has been reported determined to be higher than 1 TPa by computation [ 29 ] and experimental measuring [ 24, 25, 30, 31 ] , which is about the same as diamond. However the Young ‘s modulus of Fe is around 190-210 GPa [ 32 ] , which is merely 1/5 that of SWNTs. These belongingss render C nanotubes suited campaigners for reenforcing complexs and ultrahigh frequence nano-mechanical resonating chamber applications [ 33-36 ] .

2.2.3 Thermal conduction

SWNTs are of great involvement non merely for their electronic and mechanical belongingss, but besides for their thermic belongingss. It is known that monocrystalline diamond is one of the best thermic music directors as the atoms are connected by stiff sp3 bonds [ 37 ] . Held together by stronger sp2 I?bonds, C nanotubes are expected to hold an remarkably high thermic conductance [ 38 ] . Room temperature thermic conduction of SWNTs has been predicted to be highly high, transcending even that of black lead or diamond [ 17 ] . For a individual ( 10,10 ) SWNT, the thermic conduction was measured to be 6, 600 W/mA·K, transcending the reported room temperature thermic conduction of isotopically pure diamond by about a factor of 2 [ 18 ] .

In add-on, nanotube-based complexs have been reported to hold better thermic conduction as the SWNTs play an of import function of it. Addition of merely 1wt % unpurified SWNT to epoxy rosin can increase the thermic conduction at 40K by 70 % , lifting to 125 % at room temperature, three times the sweetening observed for of a similar lading the same per centum of vapor adult C fibres, demoing that nanotube composite stuffs may be utile for thermic direction applications [ 39 ] .

2.2.4 Nanoscale electronic belongingss

Scaning investigation microscopes ( SPMs ) such as the scanning burrowing microscope ( STM ) and atomic force microscope ( AFM ) are now widely used for the survey of nano-structures and have the capableness of working at length graduated tables every bit little as a individual atom [ 40, 41 ] . However, the individual investigation tip used in SPMs can non catch an object, and a 2nd contact is indispensable to the measuring of the electrical belongingss of the same sample, which limit the tool ‘s ‘ ability to pull strings objects and step the physical belongingss. The combination of two investigations in the signifier of pincers could get the better of these restrictions of SPMs and therefore might enable new types of fiction and easy electrical measurings on nanostructures. The nano-scale construction combined with the alone electronic belongingss make render SWNTs to be an optimal campaigner for this sort of nanometer-scale electromechanical pincers [ 42 ] , by which the person nanostructure and their electrical belongingss can be straight probed.

2.2.5 Energy storage

Combined with little dimensions, a smooth surface topology, and perfect surface specificity, C nanotubes are considered ideal constructions for energy production and storage [ 19 ] . It has been proven that, compared to conventional C electrodes, the negatron transportation dynamicss take placeare fastest on nanotubes, following ideal Nernstian behaviour [ 43 ] . Their public presentation has been found to be superior to other C electrodes in footings of reaction rates and reversibility [ 44 ] . The interaction of Li-C makes renders SWNTs to be possible battery electrodes, the reversible and irreversible capacities were holding been reported to be 400-650 mAh/g reversible and 1000 mAh/g [ 45 ] .

Because of their cylindrical and hollow geometry, and nanometer-scale diameters, it has been predicted that the C nanotubes can hive away liquid and gas in their inner nucleuss through a capillary consequence. Inordinately high and reversible H surface assimilation in SWNT incorporating stuffs has been reported and has attracted considerable involvement in both academic and industry [ 46-48 ] .

1.3 What are the applications of SWNTs?

The delocalized Iˆ-electron donated by each C atom within the nanotube lattice is free to travel about the full construction, instead than stay with its giver atom, giving rise to the first known molecule with metallic-type electrical conduction. Furthermore, the high-frequency carbon-carbon bond quivers provide an intrinsic thermic conduction higher than even diamond. As true nano-scale molecules, SWNTs can be manipulated chemically and physically in really utile ways.

They potentially open up an unbelievable scope of applications in stuffs scientific discipline ( reinforcement fibers for composite as SWNTs have high strength, high facet ratio, high thermal and chemical stableness ) [ 39 ] , electronics ( carry oning nanowires and field emitters as the first-class electronic belongingss of SWNTs ) [ 49-52 ] , nanotools ( tips for Scaning Tunneling, Atomic Force, Magnetic Resonance Force and Scanning Near-field Optical, Chemical/Biological Force Microscope tips, nanomanipulators, nanotweezers ) [ 36, 53 ] energy direction [ 46, 47, 54, 55 ] , medical scientific discipline and biological [ 56 ] , and many other Fieldss [ 57, 58 ] .

Since C nanotubes have so many first-class belongingss and possible applications described above, it is extremely desirable to hold big measures of these pure nanotubes. Today, many different techniques exist and are used to bring forth the stuff. Table 1 shows a sum-up of the modern-day SWNTs synthesis techniques and merchandise description [ 59 ] .

2.4 How to Produce SWNTs?

1.4.1 Electric discharge discharge

The electric discharge discharge method, ab initio used for bring forthing C60 fullerenes [ 3 ] , was the first reported and is one of still most widely used techniques for the production of SWNTs. Isolated SWNTs can be produced by including passage metals as accelerators, such as Fe, Co, Ni and rare Earth metals such as Y and Gd [ 4, 5, 60-63 ] , whereas composite accelerator such as Fe/Ni, Co/Ni and Ni/Y have been used to synthesise ropes ( packages ) of SWNTs [ 64, 65 ] . SWNTs were have besides been prepared by utilizing assorted oxides ( Y2O3, La2O3, CeO2 ) as accelerators [ 66, 67 ] .

Typical diameters of SWNTs produced by this method are in the scope 0.9-3.1 nanometer, with an norm of 1.5 nanometers. The output and belongingss of C nanotubes produced by the arc discharge technique depend on the stableness of the plasma formed between the electrodes, the current denseness, inert gas force per unit area and chilling of electrodes and chamber, and besides the environment temperature.

Compared to other methods, arc discharge is a more common and easy manner to bring forth a less faulty, big scale merchandise. However more byproducts such as formless C, multi-shell black lead atoms and catalytic metal atoms are formed during the procedure. Removal of non-nanotube C and metal accelerator stuff is much more dearly-won than production itself.

2.4.2 Laser vaporisation

In 1995, Smalley ‘s group [ 68 ] at Rice University reported the synthesis of C nanotubes by optical maser vaporisation. The optical maser vaporisation setup used by Smalley ‘s group is shown in 1.8. The oven is filled with He or Ar gas in order to maintain the force per unit area at 500 Torr. A really hot vapour plume signifiers, so expands and cools quickly. As the gasified species cool, little C molecules and atoms rapidly condense to organize larger bunchs, perchance including fullerenes. From these initial bunchs, cannular molecules turn into single-wall C nanotubes until the accelerator particles become excessively big, or until conditions have cooled sufficiently that C no longer can spread through or over the surface of the accelerator atoms. It is besides possible that the atoms become that muchsufficiently coated with a C bed that they can non absorb more and the nanotube Michigans turning.

In the instance of pure black lead electrodes, MWNTs are synthesised, but unvarying SWNTs could can be synthesised if a mixture of black lead with Co, Ni, Fe or Y was is used alternatively of pure black lead. The output of SWNTs strongly depends on the type of metal accelerator used and is seen to increase with furnace temperature, among other factors. Depending on the metal accelerator used, the output onf the glandular fever or bimetal accelerators are ordered as follows: Ni & gt ; Co & gt ; Pt & gt ; Cu or Nb and Co/Ni, Co/Pt & gt ; Ni/Pt & gt ; Co/Cu, severally. The Ni/Y mixture accelerator ( Ni/Y is 4.2/1 ) gave produces the best output [ 69 ] .

Table 2.1 Summary of the modern-day SWNTs synthesis techniques and merchandise description [ 59 ]

Somehow this gets lost here! ! ! !

Following should be HiPco

This subdivision will give a brief penetration of a choice figure of production methods. The methods which will be discussed are electric arc-discharge [ 5, 70 ] , pulsed optical maser vaporisation [ 71-74 ] , Chemical vapor deposition [ 75-78 ] and high force per unit area decomposition of C monoxide besides referred to as the HiPco procedure [ 79-81 ] . The arc-discharge technique was the first technique by which SWNT were produced and it was from a basic apprehension of this technique that many other man-made methods were spawned. The optical maser extirpation technique was the first technique to bring forth SWNT en mass. As described in table 1, Chemical vapour deposition ( CVD ) is the cheapest commercial, up-scalable, most executable from the application point of position. Finally the HiPco procedure is discussed as it is by far one of the most common techniques used to bring forth high pureness SWNT today. SWNTs produced by HiPco methods are used for this survey.

The SWNTs formed in this instance are bundled together by new wave der Waals forces [ 82 ] , and they exist as ‘ropes ‘ , ( see 2.9 ) [ 78 ] . The diameter of the SWNTs ranges from 1-2 nanometer. For illustration the Ni/Co accelerator with a pulsed optical maser at 1470 A°C gives SWNTs with a diameter of 1.3-1.4 nm [ 83 ] . In the instance of a uninterrupted optical maser at 1200 A°C and Ni/Y accelerator ( Ni/Y is 2:0.5 at. % ) , SWNTs with an mean diameter of 1.4 nanometers were formed with 20- 30 % output [ 84 ] .

Nanotubes produced by optical maser extirpation are purer ( up to about 90 % pureness ) than those produced in the arc discharge procedure. Unfortunately, the optical maser technique is non economically advantageous because the procedure involves high-purity black lead rods, the optical maser powers required are high ( in some instances two optical maser beams are required ) , and the sum of SWNTs that can be produced per twenty-four hours is non every bit high as the discharge discharge method.

All the above subdivision is mixed? ? ? ?

2.4.3 Chemical vapour deposition ( CVD )

Chemical vapour deposition ( CVD ) is one of the most popular methods for synthesising SWNTs. CVD is really different from the electric discharge discharge and optical maser vaporisation. Arc discharge and optical maser vaporisation can be classified as high temperature ( & gt ; 3000K ) and short clip reaction ( I?s-ms ) techniques, whereas catalytic CVD is a medium temperature ( 700-1473K ) and long clip reaction ( typically proceedingss to hours ) technique. SWNTs produced by CVD techniques can turn on a conventional or patterned substrate, which makes allows the possibility of synthesizing aligned SWNTs [ 77, 85-87 ] by CVD method, which besides an advantage of this method compared with arc discharge and optical maser vaporisation techniques. In the last 10 old ages, different techniques for the synthesis of C nanotubes with CVD have been developed, such as plasma enhanced CVD [ 88, 89 ] , thermic chemical CVD [ 90 ] , intoxicant catalytic CVD [ 90, 91 ] , vapour stage growing [ 92 ] , aero gel-supported CVD [ 93 ] and laser-assisted CVD [ 94 ] . Typical outputs for CVD are about 30 % .

2.4.4 High force per unit area decomposition of C monoxide ( HiPco )

The High force per unit area CO disproportionation procedure ( HiPco ) is a technique for catalytic production of SWNTs in a continuous-flow gas stage utilizing CO as the C feedstock and Fe ( CO ) 5 as the iron-containing accelerator precursor. SWNTs are produced by fluxing CO, assorted with a little sum of Fe ( CO ) 5 through a het reactor. The current production rates approach 450 mg/h ( or 10 g/day ) , and nanotubes typically have no more than 7 mol % of Fe drosss. 21.10 ( look into consistence of totaling through out ) shows the layout of a CO flow-tube reactor [ 95 ] .

Explain how Fe atoms are formed foremost? ? ? SWNTs nucleate and turn on these atoms in the gas stage via CO disproportionation: CO + CO — & gt ; CO2 + C ( SWNT ) , catalyzed by the Fe surface. The concentration of CO2 produced in this reaction is equal to that of C and can hence function as a utile real-time feedback parametric quantity. Size and diameter distribution of the nanotubes can be approximately selected by commanding the force per unit area of CO.

The mean diameter of HiPco SWNTs is about 1.1 nm [ 96 ] , which is typically smaller than SWNTs produced by the laser-oven procedure, where the mean diameter is about 1.3 – 1.4 nm [ 83 ] . The dominant dross in HiPco nanotubes is the metal accelerator, which is encased in thin C shells and distributed throughout the sample as 3-5 nm size atoms [ 96 ] .

Compared with other techniques, production by the HiPco method has the advantages of high quality, easiness of purification and big scale commercial merchandises.

1.5 What jobs exist for industrial applications?

SWNTs have been predicted to hold many applications, including conductive and high-strength complexs ; energy storage and energy transition devices ; detectors ; field emanation shows and radiation beginnings ; H storage media ; and nanometer-sized semiconducting material devices, investigations, and interconnects. Some of these applications are now have already been realized in merchandises [ 36, 46, 52 ] . , hHowever most are still in the phase of laboratory research. Nanotube cost, polydispersity in nanotube type, and restriction in processing and assembly methods are of import barriers for some applications to come to the industrial phase.

Although SWNTs were discovered more than a decennary ago, and many production methods have been developed, research workers are still giving considerable attempt to happening a proper manner to synthesise high quality, low cost SWNTs, to confront the increasing demand of developing industry. The aCurrently, as produced SWNTs presents ever have many drosss, such as fullerenes, metal atoms from the accelerator which are ever coated by a C bed, and formless C. Often the remotion of the by merchandise costs more than the synthesis of SWNTs, impeding the application of SWNTs in many Fieldss such as electronics where high pureness is needed. The monetary value of SWNTs still remains really expensivehigh: In 2010, high pureness ( 90 % ) tubes cost a‚¬380.50/g and even samples incorporating significant drosss cost a‚¬192/g [ 97 ] . The high cost of SWNTs resists is an hindrance to their big graduated table of their applications.

In add-on, strong new wave der wWaals force between the tubings makes them staymeans that they grow in packages or ropes ( 2.x ) . Their comparative unsolvability in common organic dissolvers compounds the job and the solubilisation and scattering of SWNTs remains a challenge for the discovery of the application of SWNTs. Furthermore, the synthesis of the SWNTs is non structurally specific and therefore every bit produced samples contain metallic and semiconductive constructions. The polydispersity in nanotube type makes it hard if specific electronic constructions are needed. Thus the choice of SWNTs with different electronic belongingss becomes indispensable [ 98 ] .

1.6 How to work out the jobs?

Since the find of SWNTs, scientists from the chemical, physical and biological scientific disciplines have been seeking to work out the bing jobs. Attempts include the development of the synthesis method to acquire high measure and quality and low cost tubings [ 99-101 ] every bit good as covalent [ 102-104 ] and noncovalent [ 105-108 ] functionalisation of SWNTs to better the solubility in H2O and common organic dissolvers. Depending on the responsiveness of the drosss and the stableness of the tubings, chemical and physical or even combined methods have been developed to sublimate and debundle SWNTs. These include oxidization in air or acid and micro-cook intervention [ 109 ] , size choice chromatography [ 109-111 ] , filtration [ 112 ] , and straight fade outing [ 113, 114 ] SWNTs in organic dissolvers.

1.6.1 The development of synthesis methods

From the first clip SWNTs were found in the production of fullerene by the arc discharge technique, the hunt for a manner to acquire high output, high quality and low cost SWNTs have has non stopped. The techniques of Llaser vaporisation, chemical vapour deposition ( CVD ) and high force per unit area decomposition of C monoxide ( HiPco ) have been invented besidesdeveloped in add-on to the arc discharge technique. The development of synthesisc techniques is the cardinal manner to acquire achieve good quality tubings, without the necessity of farther processing. However, the most successful production techniques presently, the HiPco procedure ( discussed above ) and chemical vapour deposition ( CVD ) , still necessitate to be improved as the merchandise contains 10 % drosss, and the output for a yearss production is around several gms [ 115 ] .

1.6.2 Functionalisation of SWNTs

Introducing functional groups onto the surface of SWNTs helps to solubilise these utile molecules and facilitates their practical applications. The covalent fond regard of chemical groups through reactions onto the Iˆ -conjugated skeleton of SWNTs has been shown to better the solubility of SWNTs expeditiously. Among the assorted attacks, the most general include: I ) esterification [ 116 ] or amidation [ 117 ] of oxidised nanotubes, two ) side-wall covalent fond regard of functional groups [ 118 ] .

The terminal caps of SWNTs can be opened by scattering of SWNTs in acidic media, which is based on oxidization of natural SWNTs [ 119 ] . These acidic functionalized defect sites are suited for farther derivatization. The carboxylic groups formed on the surface of the SWNTs can respond with long- concatenation alkylamine [ 120 ] , aminoalkanes [ 120, 121 ] . The solubility of modified SWNTs in organic dissolvers has been increased dramatically, up to 0.5 mg/ml in tetrahydrofuran or dichlorobenzene.

Recently, Torres and Basiukreported a theoretical survey of the reactions of monocarboxy-substituted oxidised tips of zigzag and armchair SWNTs with methyl alcohol. The consequence showed that the zigzag nanotube isomer is more reactive as compared to its armchair opposite number. This might open a new path to selective derivatization of different signifiers of SWNTs, therefore assisting their separation and purification due to differences in solubility [ 116 ] .

Side wall chemical functionalisation of SWNTs is anticipated to ease applications by bettering the solubility and easiness of scattering, and supplying for chemical fond regard to surfaces and polymer matrices. Attachment of functional groups or aliphatic C ironss to the nanotubes can dramatically increase the solubility of SWNTs. Chemically modified C nanotubes can easy be fixed on a surface via chemical bonds from the surface to the nanotube. Organic molecules like dyes, proteins or nucleic acids may be coupled with functionalized nanotubes for detector applications. Side wall functional groups should respond with polymers and better the mechanical belongingss of nanocomposites. Tubes SWNTs interconnected by chemical bonds will hold a reduced contact opposition in carry oning and crystalline beds. Furthermore, chemical alteration should avoid bundling and increase the specific surface country for gas, in peculiar for H2 surface assimilation. Even for interconnectedness intents in nanoscale circuits, suited functionalization provides an attractive method to associate single tubings to organize more complex webs.

1.6.3 Purification of SWNTs

Since the find of SWNTs, important attempts have been directed at developing the synthesis techniques of this utile stuff. However, singular sum of drosss are contained in the merchandises, including metal atoms from accelerator ( CVD and HiPco ) , graphitic nanoparticles, formless C, fullerenes, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, and other types of C. Even for the most successful techniques, HiPco and CVD, the content of SWNTs in the production is merely about 90 % . Oxidation

Gas oxidization and acerb oxidization [ 109 ] are common techniques to sublimate as produced SWNTs, and the combination of the two has besides been widely used. The techniques involve firing off formless C by heating the C nanotubes in air or other oxidizing agents at 600 K. Besides in 2002, Harutyunyan et al [ 122 ] reported a new oxidization method for sublimating SWNTs utilizing microwave warming. They have found that in the presence of residuary metal accelerator atoms, the temperature in the microwave raised increased significantly, which taking to both the oxidization and tearing rupture of the C bed coat on the metal accelerator atoms and sintering. With this protective C coating weakened or removed, the remotion of the metal atoms by HCl acid is enabled [ 122 ] .

The oxidization method is an effectual technique for purification of SWNTs. However, little diameter tubings are preferentially lost in the cleansing procedure [ 96 ] , or the pristine belongingss of the tubings were damaged. Besides it should be noted that this technique offers no grade of selectivity of the C nanotubes. Size Selection Chromatography

Size exclusion chromatography ( SEC ) is a powerful and non-destructive method for separation of C nanotubes with regard to the changing lengths of SWNTs [ 110, 111, 123 ] . The SEC method is a multistep procedure utilizing a stationary stage with defined pore sizes. Avoiding the blocking of pores which occurs in the filtration technique, Tthe SEC method provides an effectual and non-destructive manner for purification of SWNTs from C nanospheres, metal atoms, and formless C.

The technique can be applied to a assortment of different scatterings of SWNTs in solution, including wetting agent ( sodium dodecyl sulphate ) stabilized scatterings in H2O [ 110 ] , chemical alteration in organic dissolvers and by DNA in aqueous solution [ 124 ] . The solution is passed through a column incorporating porous glass, ( CPG 3000 A , Fluka ) with a pore size of 300 nanometer. It works on the footing that the pores are big plenty to pin down the formless C in the pit, but allow free transition of the SWNT through the column. The SWNT are excessively big for the pit and are collected in the fraction taken from the column [ 111 ] . Atomic force microscopy ( AFM ) probes confirm that predominately individual tubings are produced from DNA scatterings. Length separation can be affected, but no diameter selectivity was inferred or observed. Filtration

As with size choice chromatography, the filtration technique is non-destructive to SWNTs. However the SWNTs stuffs processed by this method suffer in general from taint of the filter membrane, and the blocking of the pores besides limit the efficiency of this method. To get the better of these jobs, this technique is frequently used in combination with other methods such as oxidization [ 125 ] and ultra-sonication [ 126 ] . Depending on the quality of the get downing stuff, this technique generates SWNTs with pureness of more than 90 % and give 30-70 % . The disadvantage of this method, nevertheless, is that it leaves some formless and onionated atoms stuck to nanoropes. Solubilization of SWNTs

The direct scattering of natural SWNTs in proper media, such as organic dissolvers, is besides an attractive method of purification and scattering of the as-produced stuffs. SWNTs typically exist as ropes or packages of 10- 30 nanometer in diameter because of strong new wave der Waals interactions that result in stacking and entangling. Over the old ages, unremitting attempt has been towards the hunt for appropriate dissolvers to solubilize pristine nanotubes.

Highly polar dissolvers such as N, N-dimethylformamide ( DMF ) , N – methylpyrrolidinone ( NMP ) , and hexamethylphosphoramide ( HMPA ) were the most attractive picks for scattering of SWNTs [ 114 ] . These dissolvers having high negatron brace donicity ( I? ) and low H bond parametric quantity ( I± ) were demonstrated the ability to readily organize stable scatterings. By look intoing the solubility of SWNTs in a assortment of dissolvers, Torrens pointed out that non-hydrogen-bonding Lewis bases provides good solubility, and the SWNTs were positively charged in some dissolvers, nevertheless in water- Triton X are negative [ 127 ] . Furthermore, stable suspensions of SWNTs were prepared by sonicating purified stuff in DMF [ 128, 129 ] . The solubility of small-diameter HiPco-SWNTs was besides investigated in several organic dissolvers, and 1,2-dichlorobenzene was found to be the most appropriate medium by UV-vis soaking up spectrometry [ 130 ] .

As SWNTs have been proven to hold good solubility in amide dissolvers [ 114, 130 ] , an in- deepness survey of the interaction between NMP and HiPco SWNTs was carried out by Giordani et al [ 131 ] . Atomic force microscopy ( AFM ) , UV-vis- NIR soaking up, NIR photoluminescence, and Raman spectroscopy were employed to demo that single-walled nanotubes can be debundled merely by cut downing the nanotube concentration in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone scatterings. The scattering bound of SWNTs in NMP was found to be 0.02 mg/mL. The mean bundle diameter lessenings with diminishing concentration before saturating at about 2 nanometers below a concentration of 0.008mg/mL. In add-on, a population of single nanotubes is present at all concentrations, the per centum of single tubings additions with diminishing concentration until about 70 % of all spread objects are single nanotubes at a concentration of 0.004 mg/mL.

By look intoing the influence of different dissolvers on individualisation of SWNTs, Kim et Al found that the dissolver is non the lone factor which infects affects the solubility of SWNTs. Ultrasonication and centrifugation are of import to individualise SWNTs. They studied the solubility of SWNTs in 7 different dissolvers, and found that 1,2-dichlorobenzene ( DCB ) and monochlorobenzene ( MCB ) have better solubility than the amide dissolvers, such as N, N-dimethylacetamide ( DMA ) , N, N-dimethylpropanamide ( DMP ) , N, N-diethylacetamide ( DEA ) , N, N-dimethylformamide ( DMF ) [ 132 ] .

The concluding decision indicated that the scattering of SWNTs in a specific medium depends on non merely the belongingss of the dissolvers, but besides their production method, the content of dross, and the process applied for purify the natural stuffs. In add-on, ulrtrasonication and centrifugation are of import to individualise SWNTs.

1.7 Drumhead

This chapter gives provided a brief debut of to Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes, particularly the construction, belongingss, produce production methods and jobs duringimpediments to realization of their applications potency. Due to the alone construction, SWNTs are predicted to hold first-class electrical, mechanical belongingss, and besides have great possible application in energy storage, thermic conducting. Although the man-made techniques have been developing for about two decennaries, the as-produced SWNTs are still non readily run intoing the demands. Different purification methods have been developed for different intents. Proper dissolvers, in which pristine SWNTs can be dispersed and debundled without debut of any 3rd constituent in the solution, will be greatare extremely desirable for the publicity of the application of SWNTs.


1. hypertext transfer protocol: //

2. Rao, C.N.R. , B.C. Satishkumar, A. Govindaraj, and M. Nath, Nanotubes. Chemphyschem, 2001. 2 ( 2 ) : p. 78-105.

3. Iijima, S. , Helical Microtubules of Graphitic Carbon. Nature, 1991. 354 ( 6348 ) : p. 56-58.

4. Bethune, D.S. , C.H. Kiang, M.S. Devriess, G. Gorman, R. Savoy, J. Vazquez, and R. Beyers, Cobalt-Catalyzed Growth of Carbon Nanotubes with Single-Atomic-Layerwalls. Nature, 1993. 363 ( 6430 ) : p. 605-607.

5. Iijima, S. and T. Ichihashi, Single-Shell Carbon Nanotubes of 1-Nm Diameter ( Vol 363, Pg 603, 1993 ) . Nature, 1993. 364 ( 6439 ) : p. 737-737.

6. Wildoer, J.W.G. , L.C. Venema, A.G. Rinzler, R.E. Smalley, and C. Dekker, Electronic construction of atomically resolved C nanotubes. Nature, 1998. 391 ( 6662 ) : p. 59-62.

7. Odom, T.W. , J.L. Huang, P. Kim, and C.M. Lieber, Atomic construction and electronic belongingss of single-walled C nanotubes. Nature, 1998. 391 ( 6662 ) : p. 62-64.

8. Gao, G.H. , T. Cagin, and W.A. Goddard, Energetics, construction, mechanical and vibrational belongingss of single-walled C nanotubes. Nanotechnology, 1998. 9 ( 3 ) : p. 184-191.

9. Rao. C.N. R. , G.A. , Nanotubes and Nanowires. 2005.

10. hypertext transfer protocol: //

11. Dresselhaus, M.S. , G. Dresselhaus, and P. and Eklund, Science of Fullerenes and Carbon Nanotubes. Academic Press 1996.

12. Saito, R. , M. Fujita, G. Dresselhaus, and M.S. Dresselhaus, Electronic-Structure of Chiral Graphene Tubules. Applied Physics Letters, 1992. 60 ( 18 ) : p. 2204-2206.

13. Kataura, H. , Y. Kumazawa, Y. Maniwa, I. Umezu, S. Suzuki, Y. Ohtsuka, and Y. Achiba, Optical belongingss of single-wall C nanotubes. Man-made Metallic elements, 1999. 103 ( 1-3 ) : p. 2555-2558.

14. Yu, M.F. , B.S. Files, S. Arepalli, and R.S. Ruoff, Tensile burden of ropes of individual wall C nanotubes and their mechanical belongingss. Physical Review Letters, 2000. 84 ( 24 ) : p. 5552-5555.

15. Zhou, C.W. , J. Kong, and H.J. Dai, Intrinsic electrical belongingss of single single-walled C nanotubes with little set spreads. Physical Review Letters, 2000. 84 ( 24 ) : p. 5604-5607.

16. Javey, A. , M. Shim, and H.J. Dai, Electrical belongingss and devices of large-diameter single-walled C nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters, 2002. 80 ( 6 ) : p. 1064-1066.

17. Hone, J. , M. Whitney, C. Piskoti, and A. Zettl, Thermal conduction of single-walled C nanotubes. Physical Review B, 1999. 59 ( 4 ) : p. R2514-R2516.

18. Berber, S. , Y.K. Kwon, and D. Tomanek, Unusually high thermic conduction of C nanotubes. Physical Review Letters, 2000. 84 ( 20 ) : p. 4613-4616.

19. Ajayan, P.M.Z. , O. Z. , Applications of C nanotubes. Carbon Nanotubes, 2001. 80: p. 391-425.

20. Thess, A. , R. Lee, P. Nikolaev, H.J. Dai, P. Petit, J. Robert, C.H. Xu, Y.H. Lee, S.G. Kim, A.G. Rinzler, D.T. Colbert, G.E. Scuseria, D. Tomanek, J.E. Fischer, and R.E. Smalley, Crystalline ropes of metallic C nanotubes. Science, 1996. 273 ( 5274 ) : p. 483-487.

21. Collins, P.G. and P. Avouris, Nanotubes for electronics. Scientific American, 2000. 283 ( 6 ) : p. 62-+ .

22. Anantram, M.P. and F. Leonard, Physics of C nanotube electronic devices. Reports on Advancement in Physicss, 2006. 69 ( 3 ) : p. 507-561.

23. hypertext transfer protocol: //

24. Treacy, M.M.J. , T.W. Ebbesen, and J.M. Gibson, Exceptionally high Young ‘s modulus observed for single C nanotubes. Nature, 1996. 381 ( 6584 ) : p. 678-680.

25. Lourie, O. and H.D. Wagner, Evaluation of Young ‘s modulus of C nanotubes by micro-Raman spectrometry. Journal of Materials Research, 1998. 13 ( 9 ) : p. 2418-2422.

26. Poncharal, P. , Z.L. Wang, D. Ugarte, and W.A. de Heer, Electrostatic warps and electromechanical resonances of C nanotubes. Science, 1999. 283 ( 5407 ) : p. 1513-1516.

27. Bruno walters, D.A. , L.M. Ericson, M.J. Casavant, J. Liu, D.T. Colbert, K.A. Smith, and R.E. Smalley, Elastic strain of freely suspended single-wall C nanotube ropes. Applied Physics Letters, 1999. 74 ( 25 ) : p. 3803-3805.

28. Yu, M.F. , O. Lourie, M.J. Dyer, K. Moloni, T.F. Kelly, and R.S. Ruoff, Strength and interrupting mechanism of multiwalled C nanotubes under tensile burden. Science, 2000. 287 ( 5453 ) : p. 637-640.

29. Lu, J.P. , Elastic belongingss of C nanotubes and nanoropes. Physical Review Letters, 1997. 79 ( 7 ) : p. 1297-1300.

30. Rice, N.A. , K. Soper, N.Z. Zhou, E. Merschrod, and Y.M. Zhao, Scattering as-prepared single-walled C nanotube pulverizations with additive conjugated polymers. Chemical Communications, 2006 ( 47 ) : p. 4937-4939.

31. Krishnan, A. , E. Dujardin, T.W. Ebbesen, P.N. Yianilos, and M.M.J. Treacy, Young ‘s modulus of single-walled nanotubes. Physical Review B, 1998. 58 ( 20 ) : p. 14013-14019.

32. hypertext transfer protocol: //’s_modulus.

33. Babic, B. , J. Furer, S. Sahoo, S. Farhangfar, and C. Schonenberger, Intrinsic thermic quivers of suspended double clamped single-wall C nanotubes. Nano Letters, 2003. 3 ( 11 ) : p. 1577-1580.

34. Li, C.Y. and T.W. Chou, Single-walled C nanotubes as ultrahigh frequence nanomechanical resonating chambers. Physical Review B, 2003. 68 ( 7 ) : p. – .

35. Li, C.Y. and T.W. Chou, Strain and force per unit area feeling utilizing single-walled C nanotubes. Nanotechnology, 2004. 15 ( 11 ) : p. 1493-1496.

36. Cheung, C.L. , J.H. Hafner, and C.M. Lieber, Carbon nanotube atomic force microscopy tips: Direct growing by chemical vapour deposition and application to high-resolution imagination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000. 97 ( 8 ) : p. 3809-3813.

37. Wei, L.H. , P.K. Kuo, R.L. Thomas, T.R. Anthony, and W.F. Banholzer, Thermal-Conductivity of Isotopically Modified Single-Crystal Diamond. Physical Review Letters, 1993. 70 ( 24 ) : p. 3764-3767.

38. Hone, J. , Carbon Nanotubes: Thermal Properties. Dekker Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2004.

39. Biercuk, M.J. , M.C. Llaguno, M. Radosavljevic, J.K. Hyun, A.T. Johnson, and J.E. Fischer, Carbon nanotube complexs for thermic direction. Applied Physics Letters, 2002. 80 ( 15 ) : p. 2767-2769.

40. Hla, S.W. , Scaning burrowing microscopy individual atom/molecule use and its application to nanoscience and engineering. Journal of Vacuum Science & A ; Technology B, 2005. 23 ( 4 ) : p. 1351-1360.

41. Oyabu, N. , O. Custance, I.S. Yi, Y. Sugawara, and S. Morita, Mechanical perpendicular use of selected individual atoms by soft nanoindentation utilizing near contact atomic force microscopy. Physical Review Letters, 2003. 90 ( 17 ) : p. – .

42. Kim, P. and C.M. Lieber, Nanotube nanotweezers. Science, 1999. 286 ( 5447 ) : p. 2148-2150.

43. Nugent, J.M. , K.S.V. Santhanam, A. Rubio, and P.M. Ajayan, Fast negatron transportation dynamicss on multiwalled C nanotube microbundle electrodes. Nano Letters, 2001. 1 ( 2 ) : p. 87-91.

44. Britto, P.J. , K.S.V. Santhanam, and P.M. Ajayan, Carbon nanotube electrode for oxidization of Dopastat. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, 1996. 41 ( 1 ) : p. 121-125.

45. Gao, B. , A. Kleinhammes, X.P. Tang, C. Bower, L. Fleming, Y. Wu, and O. Zhou, Electrochemical embolism of single-walled C nanotubes with Li. Chemical Physics Letters, 1999. 307 ( 3-4 ) : p. 153-157.

46. Luxembourg, D. , G. Flamant, E. Beche, J.L. Sans, J. Giral, and V. Goetz, Hydrogen storage capacity at high force per unit area of natural and purified individual wall C nanotubes produced with a solar reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007. 32 ( 8 ) : p. 1016-1023.

47. Cheng, H.M. , Q.H. Yang, and C. Liu, Hydrogen storage in C nanotubes. Carbon, 2001. 39 ( 10 ) : p. 1447-1454.

48. Liu, C. , Y.Y. Fan, M. Liu, H.T. Cong, H.M. Cheng, and M.S. Dresselhaus, Hydrogen storage in single-walled C nanotubes at room temperature. Science, 1999. 286 ( 5442 ) : p. 1127-1129.

49. Milne, W.I. , K.B.K. Teo, G.A.J. Amaratunga, P. Legagneux, L. Gangloff, J.P. Schnell, V. Semet, V.T. Binh, and O. Groening, Carbon nanotubes as field emanation beginnings. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2004. 14 ( 6 ) : p. 933-943.

50. Saito, Y. and S. Uemura, Field emanation from C nanotubes and its application to electron beginnings. Carbon, 2000. 38 ( 2 ) : p. 169-182.

51. Dekker, C. , Carbon nanotubes as molecular quantum wires. Physicss Today, 1999. 52 ( 5 ) : p. 22-28.

52. Diehl, M.R. , D.W. Steuerman, H.R. Tseng, S.A. Vignon, A. Star, P.C. Celestre, J.F. Stoddart, and J.R. Heath, Single-walled C nanotube based molecular switch tunnel junctions. Chemphyschem, 2003. 4 ( 12 ) : p. 1335-1339.

53. M.S. Dresselhaus, G.D. , Ph. Avouris Carbon Nanotubes: Synthesis, Structure, Properties and Applications. Springer, 2001.

54. Kowalczyk, P. , L. Brualla, A. Zywocinski, and S.K. Bhatia, Single-walled C nanotubes: Efficient nanomaterials for separation and on-board vehicle storage of H and methane mixture at room temperature? Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2007. 111 ( 13 ) : p. 5250-5257.

55. Chen, Y. , P. Wang, C. Liu, and H.M. Cheng, Improved H storage public presentation of Li-Mg-N-H stuffs by optimising composing and adding single-walled C nanotubes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007. 32 ( 9 ) : p. 1262-1268.

56. Lin, Y. , S. Taylor, H.P. Li, K.A.S. Fernando, L.W. Qu, W. Wang, L.R. Gu, B. Zhou, and Y.P. Sun, Advances toward bioapplications of C nanotubes. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2004. 14 ( 4 ) : p. 527-541.

57. Lu, S.X. and B. Panchapakesan, Photoconductivity in individual wall C nanotube sheets. Nanotechnology, 2006. 17 ( 8 ) : p. 1843-1850.

58. hypertext transfer protocol: //

59. Kuzmany, H. , A. Kukovecz, F. Simon, A. Holzweber, C. Kramberger, and T. Pichler, Functionalization of C nanotubes. Synth. met. , 2004. 141 ( 1-2 ) : p. 113-122.

60. Subramoney, S. , R.S. Ruoff, D.C. Lorents, and R. Malhotra, Radial Single-Layer Nanotubes. Nature, 1993. 366 ( 6456 ) : p. 637-637.

61. Saito, Y. , M. Okuda, N. Fujimoto, T. Yoshikawa, M. Tomita, and T. Hayashi, Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes Turning Radially from Ni Fine Particles Formed by Arc Evaporation. Nipponese Journal of Applied Physics Part 2-Letters, 1994. 33 ( 4A ) : p. L526-L529.

62. Zhou, D. , S. Seraphin, and S. Wang, Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Turning Radially from Yc2 Particles. Applied Physics Letters, 1994. 65 ( 12 ) : p. 1593-1595.

63. Kiang, C.H. , W.A. Goddard, R. Beyers, and D.S. Bethune, Carbon Nanotubes with Single-Layer Walls. Carbon, 1995. 33 ( 7 ) : p. 903-914.

64. Seraphin, S. and D. Zhou, Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Produced at High-Yield by Mixed Catalysts. Applied Physics Letters, 1994. 64 ( 16 ) : p. 2087-2089.

65. Glerup, M. , J. Steinmetz, D. Samaille, O. Stephan, S. Enouz, A. Loiseau, S. Roth, and P. Bernier, Synthesis of N-doped SWNT utilizing the arc-discharge process. Chemical Physics Letters, 2004. 387 ( 1-3 ) : p. 193-197.

66. Saito, Y. , K. Kawabata, and M. Okuda, Single-Layered Carbon Nanotubes Synthesized by Catalytic Assistance of Rare-Earths in a Carbon-Arc. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1995. 99 ( 43 ) : p. 16076-16079.

67. Lv, X. , F. Du, Y.F. Ma, Q. Wu, and Y.S. Chen, Synthesis of high quality single-walled C nanotubes at big graduated table by electric discharge utilizing metal compounds. Carbon, 2005. 43 ( 9 ) : p. 2020-2022.

68. Guo, T. , P. Nikolaev, A.G. Rinzler, D. Tomanek, D.T. Colbert, and R.E. Smalley, Self-Assembly of Tubular Fullerenes. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1995. 99 ( 27 ) : p. 10694-10697.

69. hypertext transfer protocol: //

70. Journet, C. , W.K. Maser, P. Bernier, A. Loiseau, M.L. delaChapelle, S. Lefrant, P. Deniard, R. Lee, and J.E. Fischer, Large-scale production of single-walled C nanotubes by the electric-arc technique. Nature, 1997. 388 ( 6644 ) : p. 756-758.

71. Arepalli, S. , Laser extirpation procedure for single-walled C nanotube production. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2004. 4 ( 4 ) : p. 317-325.

72. Guo, T. , P. Nikolaev, A. Thess, D.T. Colbert, and R.E. Smalley, Catalytic Growth of Single-Walled Nanotubes by Laser Vaporization. Chemical Physics Letters, 1995. 243 ( 1-2 ) : p. 49-54.

73. Unalan, H.E. and M. Chhowalla, Investigation of single-walled C nanotube growing parametric quantities utilizing intoxicant catalytic chemical vapor deposition. Nanotechnology, 2005. 16 ( 10 ) : p. 2153-2163.

74. Puretzky, A.A. , H. Schittenhelm, X.D. Fan, M.J. Lance, L.F. Allard, and D.B. Geohegan, Investigations of single-wall C nanotube growing by time-restricted optical maser vaporisation. Physical Review B, 2002. 65 ( 24 ) : p. – .

75. Alexandrescu, R. , A. Crunteanu, R.E. Morjan, I. Morjan, F. Rohmund, L.K.L. Falk, G. Ledoux, and F. Huisken, Synthesis of C nanotubes by CO2-laser-assisted chemical vapor deposition. Infrared Physics & A ; Technology, 2003. 44 ( 1 ) : p. 43-50.

76. Casimirius, S. , E. Flahaut, C. Laberty-Robert, L. Malaquin, F. Carcenac, C. Laurent, and C. Vieu, Microcontact publishing procedure of person for the patterned growing CNTs. Microelectronic Engineering, 2004. 73-74: p. 564-569.

77. Kong, J. , H.T. Soh, A.M. Cassell, C.F. Quate, and H.J. Dai, Synthesis of single single-walled C nanotubes on patterned Si wafers. Nature, 1998. 395 ( 6705 ) : p. 878-881.

78. Vinciguerra, V. , F. Buonocore, G. Panzera, and L. Occhipinti, Growth mechanisms in chemical vapor deposited C nanotubes. Nanotechnology, 2003. 14 ( 6 ) : p. 655-660.

79. Dal, H.J. , A.G. Rinzler, P. Nikolaev, A. Thess, D.T. Colbert, and R.E. Smalley, Single-wall nanotubes produced by metal-catalyzed disproportionation of C monoxide. Chemical Physics Letters, 1996. 260 ( 3-4 ) : p. 471-475.

80. Scott, C.D. , A. Povitsky, C. Dateo, T. Gokcen, P.A. Willis, and R.E. Smalley, Iron accelerator chemical science in patterning a hard-hitting C monoxide nanotube reactor. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2003. 3 ( 1-2 ) : p. 63-73.

81. Scott, C.D. and R.E. Smalley, Effects of carbonyl bond, metal bunch dissociation, and vaporization rates on anticipations of nanotube production in hard-hitting C monoxide. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2003. 3 ( 1-2 ) : p. 75-79.

82. Ren, Z.F. , Z.P. Huang, J.W. Xu, J.H. Wang, P. Bush, M.P. Siegal, and P.N. Provencio, Synthesis of big arrays of well-aligned C nanotubes on glass. Science, 1998. 282 ( 5391 ) : p. 1105-1107.

83. Yudasaka, M. , R. Yamada, N. Sensui, T. Wilkins, T. Ichihashi, and S. Iijima, Mechanism of the consequence of NiCo, Ni and Co accelerators on the output of single-wall C nanotubes formed by pulsed Neodymium: YAG optical maser extirpation. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1999. 103 ( 30 ) : p. 6224-6229.

84. Maser, W.K. , E. Munoz, A.M. Benito, M.T. Martinez, G.F. de la Fuente, Y. Maniette, E. Anglaret, and J.L. Sauvajol, Production of high-density single-walled nanotube stuff by a simple laser-ablation method. Chemical Physics Letters, 1998. 292 ( 4-6 ) : p. 587-593.

85. Ago, H. , J.F. Qi, K. Tsukagoshi, K. Murata, S. Ohshima, Y. Aoyagi, and M. Yumura, Catalytic growing of C nanotubes and their patterning based on ink-jet and lithographic techniques. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2003. 559: p. 25-30.

86. Han, Y.S. , J.K. Shin, and S.T. Kim, Synthesis of C nanotube Bridgess on patterned Si wafers by selective sidelong growing. Journal of Applied Physics, 2001. 90 ( 11 ) : p. 5731-5734.

87. Hongo, H. , F. Nihey, and Y. Ochiai, Horizontally directional single-wall C nanotubes grown by chemical vapours deposition with a local electric field. Journal of Applied Physics, 2007. 101 ( 2 ) : p. – .

88. Amama, P.B. , M.R. Maschmann, T.S. Fisher, and T.D. Sands, Dendrimer-templated Fe nanoparticles for the growing of single-wall C nanotubes by plasma-enhanced CVD. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2006. 110 ( 22 ) : p. 10636-10644.

89. Delzeit, L. , C.V. Nguyen, R.M. Stevens, J. Han, and M. Meyyappan, Growth of C nanotubes by thermic and plasma chemical vapor deposition procedures and applications in microscopy. Nanotechnology, 2002. 13 ( 3 ) : p. 280-284.

90. Liao, H.W. and J.H. Hafner, Low-temperature single-wall C nanotube synthesis by thermic chemical vapour deposition. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004. 108 ( 22 ) : p. 6941-6943.

91. Maruyama, S. , CVD Synthesis of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes from Alcohol NANOTUBE’04 Conference, 2004.

92. Lee, C.J. , S.C. Lyu, H.W. Kim, C.Y. Park, and C.W. Yang, Large-scale production of aligned C nanotubes by the vapor stage growing method. Chemical Physics Letters, 2002. 359 ( 1-2 ) : p. 109-114.

93. Su, M. , B. Zheng, and J. Liu, A scalable CVD method for the synthesis of single-walled C nanotubes with high accelerator productiveness. Chemical Physics Letters, 2000. 322 ( 5 ) : p. 321-326.

94. Rummeli, M.H. , C. Kramberger, M. Loffler, M. Kalbac, H.W. Hubers, A. Gruneis, A. Barreiro, D. Grimm, P. Ayala, T. Gemming, F. Schaffel, L. Dunsch, B. Buchner, and T. Pichler, Synthesis of individual wall C nanotubes with invariant diameters utilizing a modified optical maser assisted chemical vapour deposition path. Nanotechnology, 2006. 17 ( 21 ) : p. 5469-5473.

95. Nikolaev, P. , M.J. Bronikowski, R.K. Bradley, F. Rohmund, D.T. Colbert, K.A. Smith, and R.E. Smalley, Gas-phase catalytic growing of single-walled C nanotubes from C monoxide. Chemical Physics Letters, 1999. 313 ( 1-2 ) : p. 91-97.

96. Chiang, I.W. , B.E. Brinson, A.Y. Huang, P.A. Willis, M.J. Bronikowski, J.L. Margrave, R.E. Smalley, and R.H. Hauge, Purification and word picture of single-wall C nanotubes ( SWNTs ) obtained from the gas-phase decomposition of CO ( HiPco procedure ) . Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2001. 105 ( 35 ) : p. 8297-8301.

97. hypertext transfer protocol: // ; 519308.

98. Krupke, R. and F. Hennrich, Separation techniques for C nanotubes. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2005. 7 ( 3 ) : p. 111-116.

99. Bae, J.C. , Y.J. Yoon, H.K. Baik, S.J. Lee, and K.M. Song, Effect of a revolving electrode on the formation of single-walled C nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters, 2003. 82 ( 13 ) : p. 2154-2156.

100. Kanai, M. , A. Koshio, H. Shinohara, T. Mieno, A. Kasuya, Y. Ando, and X. Zhao, High-yield synthesis of single-walled C nanotubes by gravity-free discharge discharge. Applied Physics Letters, 2001. 79 ( 18 ) : p. 2967-2969.

101. Wen, Q. , W.Z. Qian, F. Wei, and G.Q. Ning, Oxygen-assisted synthesis of SWNTs from methane decomposition. Nanotechnology, 2007. 18 ( 21 ) : p. – .

102. Guo, Z. , F. Du, D.M. Ren, Y.S. Chen, J.Y. Zheng, Z.B. Liu, and J.G. Tian, Covalently porphyrin-functionalized single-walled C nanotubes: a fresh photoactive and optical restricting donor-acceptor nanohybrid. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2006. 16 ( 29 ) : p. 3021-3030.

103. Wong, S.S. , E. Joselevich, A.T. Woolley, C.L. Cheung, and C.M. Lieber, Covalently functionalized nanotubes as nanometre-sized investigations in chemical science and biological science. Nature, 1998. 394 ( 6688 ) : p. 52-55.

104. Bahr, J.L. and J.M. Tour, Covalent chemical science of single-wall C nanotubes. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2002. 12 ( 7 ) : p. 1952-1958.

105. Gregan, E. , S.M. Keogh, A. Maguire, T.G. Hedderman, L.O. Neill, G. Chambers, and H.J. Byrne, Purification and isolation of SWNTs. Carbon, 2004. 42 ( 5-6 ) : p. 1031-1035.

106. Liu, Y.T. , W. Zhao, Z.Y. Huang, Y.F. Gao, X.M. Xie, X.H. Wang, and X.Y. Ye, Noncovalent surface alteration of C nanotubes for solubility in organic dissolvers. Carbon, 2006. 44 ( 8 ) : p. 1613-1616.

107. Star, A. , Y. Liu, K. Grant, L. Ridvan, J.F. Stoddart, D.W. Steuerman, M.R. Diehl, A. Boukai, and J.R. Heath, Noncovalent side-wall functionalization of single-walled C nanotubes. Macromolecules, 2003. 36 ( 3 ) : p. 553-560.

108. Chen, J. , H.Y. Liu, W.A. Weimer, M.D. Halls, D.H. Waldeck, and G.C. Walker, Noncovalent technology of C nanotube surfaces by stiff, functional conjugated polymers. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2002. 124 ( 31 ) : p. 9034-9035.

109. Li, Y. , X.B. Zhang, J.H. Luo, W.Z. Huang, J.P. Cheng, Z.Q. Luo, T. Li, F. Liu, G.L. Xu, X.X. Ke, L. Li, and H.J. Geise, Purification of CVD synthesized single-wall C nanotubes by different acerb oxidization interventions. Nanotechnology, 2004. 15 ( 11 ) : p. 1645-1649.

110. Duesberg, G.S. , M. Burghard, J. Muster, G. Philipp, and S. Roth, Separation of C nanotubes by size exclusion chromatography. Chemical Communications, 1998 ( 3 ) : p. 435-436.

111. Duesberg, G.S. , W. Blau, H.J. Byrne, J. Muster, M. Burghard, and S. Roth, Chromatography of C nanotubes. Man-made Metallic elements, 1999. 103 ( 1-3 ) : p. 2484-2485.

112. Kim, Y. and D.E. Luzzi, Purification of pulsed optical maser synthesized individual wall C nanotubes by magnetic filtration. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2005. 109 ( 35 ) : p. 16636-16643.

113. Giordani, S. , S.D. Bergin, V. Nicolosi, S. Lebedkin, M.M. Kappes, W.J. Blau, and J.N. Coleman, Debundling of single-walled nanotubes by dilution: Observation of big populations of single nanotubes in amide solvent scatterings. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006. 110 ( 32 ) : p. 15708-15718.

114. Ausman, K.D. , R. Piner, O. Lourie, R.S. Ruoff, and M. Korobov, Organic dissolver scatterings of single-walled C nanotubes: Toward solutions of pristine nanotubes. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2000. 104 ( 38 ) : p. 8911-8915.

115. Nikolaev, P. , Gas-phase production of single-walled C nanotubes from C monoxide: A reappraisal of the HiPco procedure. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2004. 4 ( 4 ) : p. 307-316.

116. Basiuk, V.A. , Activity of carboxylic groups on armchair and zigzag C nanotube tips: A theoretical survey of esterification with methyl alcohol. Nano Letters, 2002. 2 ( 8 ) : p. 835-839.

117. Basiuk, V.A. , E.V. Basiuk, and J.M. Saniger-Blesa, Direct amidation of terminal carboxylic groups of armchair and zig-zag single-walled C nanotubes: A theoretical survey. Nano Letters, 2001. 1 ( 11 ) : p. 657-661.

118. Tasis, D. , N. Tagmatarchis, V. Georgakilas, and M. Prato, Soluble C nanotubes. Chemistry-a European Journal, 2003. 9 ( 17 ) : p. 4001-4008.

119. Liu, J. , A.G. Rinzler, H.J. Dai, J.H. Hafner, R.K. Bradley, P.J. Boul, A. Lu, T. Iverson, K. Shelimov, C.B. Huffman, F. Rodriguez-Macias, Y.S. Shon, T.R. Lee, D.T. Colbert, and R.E. Smalley, Fullerene pipes. Science, 1998. 280 ( 5367 ) : p. 1253-1256.

120. Chen, J. , A.M. Rao, S. Lyuksyutov, M.E. Itkis, M.A. Hamon, H. Hu, R.W. Cohn, P.C. Eklund, D.T. Colbert, R.E. Smalley, and R.C. Haddon, Dissolution of full-length single-walled C nanotubes. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2001. 105 ( 13 ) : p. 2525-2528.

121. Hamon, M.A. , J. Chen, H. Hu, Y.S. Chen, M.E. Itkis, A.M. Rao, P.C. Eklund, and R.C. Haddon, Dissolution of single-walled C nanotubes. Adv. Mater. , 1999. 11 ( 10 ) : p. 834-840.

122. Harutyunyan, A.R. , B.K. Pradhan, J.P. Chang, G.G. Chen, and P.C. Eklund, Purification of single-wall C nanotubes by selective microwave warming of accelerator atoms. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2002. 106 ( 34 ) : p. 8671-8675.

123. Duesberg, G.S. , J. Muster, V. Krstic, M. Burghard, and S. Roth, Chromatographic size separation of single-wall C nanotubes. Applied Physics a-Materials Science & A ; Processing, 1998. 67 ( 1 ) : p. 117-119.

124. hypertext transfer protocol: // CID=6452 & A ; DID=175766 & A ; action=detail.

125. Li, H.J. , L. Feng, L.H. Guan, Z.J. Shi, and Z.N. Gu, Synthesis and purification of single-walled C nanotubes in the cottonlike carbon black. Solid State Communications, 2004. 132 ( 3-4 ) : p. 219-224.

126. Bandow, S. , A.M. Rao, K.A. Williams, A. Thess, R.E. Smalley, and P.C. Eklund, Purification of single-wall C nanotubes by microfiltration. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1997. 101 ( 44 ) : p. 8839-8842.

127. Torrens, F. , Calculations on dissolvers and co-solvents of single-wall C nanotubes: Cyclopyranoses. 2004.

128. Boul, P.J. , J. Liu, E.T. Mickelson, C.B. Huffman, L.M. Ericson, I.W. Chiang, K.A. Smith, D.T. Colbert, R.H. Hauge, J.L. Margrave, and R.E. Smalley, Reversible sidewall functionalization of buckytubes. Chemical Physics Letters, 1999. 310 ( 3-4 ) : p. 367-372.

129. Liu, J. , M.J. Casavant, M. Cox, D.A. Walters, P. Boul, W. Lu, A.J. Rimberg, K.A. Smith, D.T. Colbert, and R.E. Smalley, Controlled deposition of single single-walled C nanotubes on chemically functionalized templets. Chemical Physics Letters, 1999. 303 ( 1-2 ) : p. 125-129.

130. Bahr, J.L. , E.T. Mickelson, M.J. Bronikowski, R.E. Smalley, and J.M. Tour, Dissolution of little diameter single-wall C nanotubes in organic dissolvers? Chemical Communications, 2001 ( 2 ) : p. 193-194.

131. Giordani, S. , S.D. Bergin, V. Nicolosi, S. Lebedkin, M.M. Kappes, W.J. Blau, and J.N. Coleman, Debundling of single-walled nanotubes by dilution: Observation of big populations of single nanotubes in amide solvent scatterings. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2006. 110 ( 32 ) : p. 15708-15718.

132. Kim, D.S. , D. Nepal, and K.E. Geckeler, Individualization of single-walled C nanotubes: Is the dissolver of import? Small, 2005. 1 ( 11 ) : p. 1117-1124.

Post Author: admin


I'm Tamara!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out