Parenting can be Beneficial Perhaps no other area In the social sciences Inspires as much debate as the Issue of parents getting divorced. While many marriages end In divorce and any such breakup of the marital union Is understood to be a challenging and emotional event for anyone and everyone Involved. Researchers are particularly Interested In how divorce affects any children In the family. This effect has been the source of much controversy, as major studies in the past decade have found results are sometimes in erect opposition to each other.
Even the methods used to conduct these studies is sometimes leaves suffering families confused and wondering who they should listen to. In the article “Single Parenting can be Beneficial”, Sabina Broadband defends the ability of single parents to raise children. Her first claim states that divorce can renew fathers and mothers damaged by failing marriages and bring closeness, availability, and support to parent-child relationships. Drawing from her personal experience, Broadband also claims that children, including her own, have adjusted well to single- arena households and do not perceive themselves as disadvantaged.
She also speculates that many two-parent homes are essentially run by single parents, with one responsible for rearing children and the other earning Income. Before the article Is even set Into motion Broadband starts off with a question. Broadband asks, “Could it be that once freed of the spousal system, fathers and mothers become better parents? ” This question alone illustrates that Broadband is a firm believer in divorce and she does not condone parents who stayed together through the child- rearing years.
This quote also gives insight to the rest of the article and effectively creates interest in readers who are not obligated to continue reading. After Broadsheet’s begging statements, she makes her first claim. Due to the fact that Sabina Broadband was a teacher and a single parent when she wrote this article, this article has very little factual information. Broadband Is limited to supporting her claims with personal experiences and experiences of her students. For example, when Broadband makes her first claim that divorce can bring closeness to females, he quotes her students saying, “It’s easier since my parents separated.
There’s less tension’: ‘My mum is my friend. I can tell her anything’: ‘Before, it was them and us: now it doesn’t feel like that?I feel promoted” (Broadband). These quotes do not prove that what she has claimed is factually accurate they just validate that some children agree with her. This is the only support Broadband uses after making her first claim and the lack of evidence Is causing Broadband to lose credibility. Similar to the egging of the article, Broadband also uses questions to appeal to the readers after she makes her main claims.
By doing this, she is not providing facts but is persuading the readers to criticize the opposing viewpoints. After claiming that her children have adjusted well to a single parent household she states: “They don’t swear at me or at strangers, they don’t underachieve at school and they don’t make a habit of staggering home at three In the morning?all of which is behavior that other parents seem to consider normal In teenagers. What If It Isn’t? What If It Is the acting UT of unresolved conflicts between the parents or just poor parenting? ” (Broadband). Ambitious teenagers are simply Just acting out because their parents are married. Although the purpose of these questions is make her argument seem valid, it might Just have the opposite effect. By creating a negative correlation between rambunctious teenagers and married couples Broadband is repelling most of her audience due to being bias. After criticizing married couples and their ability to raise children, Broadband then speculates that many two-parent homes are essentially run y single parents, with one responsible for rearing children and the other earning income.
Again, Broadband does not elaborate on her claims she Just writes. This speculation has caused a significant change in her article. At this point, Broadband is focusing more on problems with marriages opposed to her initial argument with her original claims. This shift in arguments has caused Broadband to demolish any remaining credibility she had left. Coming from a single parent household I agree with most of the claims that Broadband ha presented. I agree that my older sister and
I have adjusted well to living with a single parent and we certainly do not perceive ourselves as disadvantaged. I also agree that living with one parent brings children closer to their parent they live with. However, I do not believe that this article brings justice to a topic as controversial as divorce and its aftermath. Throughout this article Broadband has touched on very few issues that children face when their parents get divorced and has barely scratched the surfaces of what children go through when being raised in a single-parent household.
I also believe that Broadband has not provided enough evidence or actual fact to support her claims. She needed to provide the readers with more evidence aside from her own experiences. Broadband also seems to be accusing others with differentiating views rather that writing objectively. Because of this, she is not affectively conveying her beliefs to readers and in turn she could possibly be considered to be unreliable. Broadband has made the article very hard to finish without getting flustered no matter what your stance is and has therefore not created an effective overall argument.