Food, civilization, spiritualty
Every faith gives an reading of the symbolic facet of nutrient, and the position of nutrient, and readings dictated by the Divine indicate to the human being his behavior towards the earthly nutrient. Food is an built-in portion of our history, and of our destiny. Theology, spiritual discourse that interprets what the Godhead indicates in His linguistic communication and liturgical texts are at that place, being the look of the Godhead in the linguistic communication of the People. Each of us has a alone manner of acting towards nutrient, adherent or non of a peculiar faith ( cultural mention system consolidating our relationship with the forces of transcendency ) .
Man, since its coming on Earth, practically selected nutrient that has been helpful for endurance. He has besides been slow to accommodate to certain nutrients and to cultivate what was natural. Later, depending on civilization and / or tradition, adult male has legislated on the classs, on helpful nutrient, bad nutrient, pleasant nutrient… By set uping rigorous cryptography regulations on how to eat, cook, etc… Man has forced many coevalss to internalise a certain gustatory sensation and to preset certain eating wonts.
Therefore, from one continent to another, whereas today it is possible to happen the same nutrient everyplace, we find that there are different ways to eat, cook and fix these nutrients.
In the corporate unconscious exists here and at that place a conditioning and larning specific to each civilization, our faiths that encourage us to screen between desirable: the known, and the unwanted: the unknown.
The nutrient remains the vector of our civilization ( our faith ) because it is meaningful. If I refuse to eat a peculiar nutrient, it is my interior “ scruples ” which tells me that there is a tabu ( although sometimes I do non cognize the ground for this prohibition and I will seek to construct a logic statement ( frequently taboo is spiritual ) .
The construct of lawful and improper, sacred and profane is a dichotomy which is similar to the cosmopolitan impression of good and evil. The difference is so made between the nutrient fouling the organic structure and nutrient profiting the organic structure. Eating a peculiar nutrient is ever a pick, an activity of the head which classes, dictates, chooses based on cultural, economic and spiritual standards. The nutrient may besides be in some traditions, a sacred nutrient, that is to state, reserved for the Gods, tantrum for ingestion by the Gods, nutrient offering or ceremonial.
The vacations are times sanctuaries where certain classs of nutrients are consumed, depending on History, Memory, Tradition ; This is how our history may be likened to the history of our favorite nutrients.
Men eat as society has taught them to feed themselves ; this grounds appears to some as baseless. We frequently love nutrient that our female parent taught us to devour. And our likes and disfavors, our nutrient antipathies are the consequence of our upbringing, our civilization, our faith.
Taste and nutrient antipathies nestle in us between the load of heredity and restraints of socialisation. All nutrient system act as a control, it is a linguistic communication of distinction and distancing. Diet indicates a belonging, an ideal. We must non bury that in the Old Testament ( Genesis – Gen.l 0.29 to 30 ) . It is recalled that the “Paradise is vegetarian ” and it was merely after the inundation that God allowed adult male to eat otherwise. It is written, “ Everything that lives and moves will function you as nutrient. ”
Food, constituent factor of cultural individuality
“ I am what I eat, what I eat transforms me ; eating transmits certain features to feeders. As a consequence, if I do non cognize what I eat, I do non cognize who I am “Claude Fischeler.
Do we eat to populate or make we populate to eat? A inquiry that frequently arises. In the face of this quandary, the reply is both simple and complex. To populate we must eat, we can non make without nutrient. Our diet and how to feed ourselves have evolved at the same gait as us. Our narrative is the narrative of our nutrient. Our relationship with nutrient is complicated, and each one of us regulations it in his ain manner, as the anchorite who needs merely small nutrient to last, basically cardinal to its endurance ; by cons if you abuse excessively much nutrient as a bulimic, it becomes unsafe and can take you to decease. We must hence follow a certain step, cognizing that nutrient is both toxicant and medical specialty.
Food is cardinal to our mental and societal existence, it accompanies us from our birth to our decease – for some civilisations beyond decease by the offerings made aˆ‹aˆ‹daily on the communion table erected to the memory of ascendants – .
Learning about our gustatory sensations and esthesiss is done really early, from our first eating ; loved nutrients are those that have the gustatory sensation and spirit of “flavoured” chest milk. Therefore our encephalon receives and industries from the first minute of our life classs, accommodating or rejecting by choosing certain gustatory sensations. We can state that the pick of our nutrient is ne’er so hazardous. This pick is ever to specific classs that have to make with our kids, our young person, our societal and cultural environment, finally our history.
Chance has small topographic point in our nutrient picks. Say that you love more this than that does non denote a individual single desire, this desire is conditioned by what we have already eaten or liked, even if we have forgotten “when and where? “ .
Food, hence, is a societal cultural phenomenon induced positively or negatively in our head, and determines our eating wonts. Our singularity is besides nutrient.
To this must be added the symbolic and fabulous representations that illustrate our fanciful perceptual experience of nutrient ; the illustration of milk may good be illustrated by the milk of Mother Wolf of Romulus and Remus, as the preferable nutrient to Paradise ( with others ) . Milk creates an inseparable affinity and makes those who were fed together “ brothers and sisters in milk “ that is to state a 3rd individual who gives the chest to other kids makes them his kids, brothers and sisters of milk of her ain kids. This will forestall them subsequently to get married from each other.
We see that eating urges the person. Eating is a societal and cultural rite that ensures continuity and diverseness in household and societal contacts. Eating together is sharing minutes and merriment with household and friends and take parting in the fusion and coherence of groups, that is to state, sociableness and keeping societal ties.
Each society has its manner of sharing nutrient. Food is meant to be shared, in order non to destruct its kernel for oneself and for others. In Hinduism, there is a warning “he who eats without cognizing putting to deaths nutrient, and if eaten, it kills. ” Be cognizant of what you eat, eating is non a fiddling affair but a societal act that determines the experience of community sharing. Brillat Savarin ( Philosophy gustatory sensation ) gives us the key to this mystery by stating us: “Tell me what you eat and I will state you who you are. ”
Modern adult male eats everything but eventually digests anything, because the culinary delectation presupposes cognition of your ain kitchen or at least its rudimentss. What distinguishes adult male from a ruminant for illustration is his consciousness of what he eats and the pleasance he derives. Each civilisation rebuilt a coherent landscape bases on nutrient, vino is magnified because it is a close relation of the Communion in the Christian Religion, and it gladdens the bosom of adult male. It keeps the image of solace for the stricken and oasis for aggrieved individuals. It is hence linked to societal marginalisation. It is more single than societal, if non portion of the whole repast that it must attach to or exemplify. Wine is consumed by experiencing “ national ” – the vino and cheese, typically Gallic image – we praise it if we are Gallic, as we praise the beer if we are German or Belgian, whisky is consumed by apery or snobbism.
As for java, it will do its entry into the Gallic universe in the 17th century, called “ philosophers ‘milk. ” It is considered a baronial drink that gives spirit and distinguished blue inebriation. Consumption will let ladies to come in the rational circles. We see that the usage of java has changed society for a societal advancement and some liberalisation of ethical motives.
In Asiatic society, eating is to equilibrate the organic structure ‘s energies, therefore guaranting a healthy feeding is besides a cultural act that has a metaphorical significance and value. At an anniversary feast, noodles ingestion agencies long life to the individual, the nutrient appears here as a vector and an auspicious message. Put on the tabular array rice stuffed dumplings to savor indicates a certain societal and household coherence. The Asiatic tabular array must follow the regulations of the three senses: sight, odor and gustatory sensation ; to this must be added the five basic gustatory sensations: sour, pungent, bitter, Sweet and salty and to hold a good repast it must revolve the chip, fondant, gluey and dry.
An Asiatic repast should be presented with all dishes together without sequence in clip. It is engulfed at a glimpse with its assortment of colorss and niceties of spirits. Thus the invitee can take what he likes, when he likes, and bask it at his convenience. Everything is at that place, everything is ordered in infinite and non in clip. The repast is served to reenforce societal dealingss, to interchange, to talk, as it is improper to eat in silence.
Chinese once used knives. They were banished from the tabular array for chopsticks, following a alteration of power. To tag this rupture, bookmans forbade the usage of the knife. Here we see the development of a tabular array usage: knives for chopsticks are go oning, what is non a happenstance but reflects the societal and political development of Chinese society.
Eat all together from a cardinal large dish, with your fingers but within a rigorous codification, eating what comes in front utilizing three fingers to dunk the staff of life in the sauce, do non cream your fingers, obeying a beat in clip and concentrating on nutrient, these are other ways to act vis- a-vis nutrient: they correspond to a certain Mediterranean cultural pattern ( particularly the Maghreb ) . Here we eat in silence as the nutrient is sacred. You must give your attending and clip.
Today the nutrient we impose has for standard regularity, shelf life, thermal consumption, go forthing the old qualities such as spirit, gustatory sensation, tradition, merriment…
The adult male has striven for centuries to diversify his supply ; He is change by reversaling it today by doing an progressively homogenous nutrient. Therefore, nutrient is disconnected from the societal and cultural organic structure which was its diverseness, plurality, and frugalness. It ‘s non the nutrient that makes the adult male, but the adult male who creates his diet.
We must therefore sometimes relearn how to eat, to sit at the tabular array to give significance to our diet. Otherwise, we may make, without recognizing it, “ nutrient autism ” We will so merely hold right to practical ideal nutrient, safe, tasteless nutrient. Then, the multi-functionality of a repast will look to us as unreal, as montages Acts of the Apostless, coincident but inconsistent, that is to state pathetic characteristics without any content.
Our nutrient is the vehicle of our symbols, it affects our lives and occupies our heads, it gives us esthesiss ; it is indispensable to our lives and to our advancement. Without nutrient, adult male would be naked: merely like he chooses his vesture, he chooses his diet, and this is what sets him apart and distinguishes him and is necessary for him to populate and be.
Food: religious nutrient?
It is interesting to see how all the great sages or high novices – if we want to utilize a scholarly term – gave a great importance to nutrient.
All spiritual people, whatever their religion, give a minute of contemplation, supplication or speculation merely earlier eating a repast and usually it takes topographic point in silence.
In some instances, the nutrient becomes a religious nutrient, because through nutrient you can feed all the parts that make up the human being, of class, the physical portion, but besides the organic structure parts that are called subtle.
Returning to the theory and instruction of Gallic philosopher and pedagogue, of Bulgarian beginning, Omraam Mikhael Aivanhov we find the significance of nutrient is really original and extremely religious. It is through nutrient that Aivanhov teaches us how we can increase our spiritualty. Food becomes, through his instructions, an act of consciousness towards which we should all strive.
Food surely has the map of feeding us physically, but besides to nurture all the other constituents of our being, all other organic structures which compose us. This will be the intent of the aeriform portion of any nutrient, feed our elusive organic structure parts which are the place of our psychic and religious maps.
The first regulation is to be cognizant of the first bite we take in our oral cavity: the beginning is highly of import, given that on it depends the remainder of the repast. If we start out the repast peacefully, it will run very well until the terminal, but if we start when we are nervous or agitated, we will stay in this status until the terminal. Harmony therefore arises from the first bite.
Food must so be chewed decently, that is to state long and easy ; because it is in the oral cavity that occurs the first digestion, even at the elusive degree. Harmonizing to Aivanhov it is in the oral cavity, through little secretory organs located under the lingua, that are absorbed aeriform atoms of nutrient, those that can be defined as the elusive energy, non heat, and serve to feed the nervous system.
The ether part is a nutrient -related coloring material, the life it contains: a universe which is located in the field of air. Therefore, to eat good, the ethereal organic structure must attach to each repast with a good external respiration. You have to believe to take a breath deeply between a bite and the other to let proper burning.
Supporting our etheric organic structure means back uping our verve, our memory, and our sensitiveness.
But consciousness is non plenty if we are traveling to feed the stellar organic structure, where our emotions and feelings reside: for this we must love the nutrient we consume. Be in harmoniousness with oneself is a cardinal status for being able to halt and hold a idea of peace, so that even this organic structure, which is more elusive, can pull out what it needs. For those who believe, it is adequate to see the nutrient as a manifestation of Divinity and concentrate on that idea to acquire the greatest benefit and enlightenment through the insistent act of the repast.
For Aivanhov, if we want to have the finer parts of the nutrient, we must be cognizant and particularly predisposed to love, and our organic structures will be unfastened and ready to have the best of the nutrient. In fact, it ‘s like when we welcome a individual with tonss of love, he ( she ) will open to us and give us all ; but if we receive him ( her ) with ill will, he ( she ) will shut and we can non acquire anything from this individual.
Merely like a flower opens and transportations all its aroma in the visible radiation and heat, the same manner the nutrient will act with us, if we are qualified to place ourselves to it positively.
Another cardinal point in his theory provinces that it is possible to eat everything, but merely as it should be eaten, and in sensible measures. Indulge and devour measures above what we truly need is harmful and promotes a loss of energy. Once you understand how to eat, it would be possible to feed in “homeopathic ” doses.
The power supply has evidently a cardinal function, but mental and religious life is more of import.
That is why the positive and full of love ideas are the footing for being able to bask to the full nutrients that are ingested. Such ideas are needed, even during a meal readying ; when we come into contact with nutrient, we can supply it with positive energy through our ideas.
Aivanhov gives precedence to nutrients that are able to develop spiritualty. With the premise that even babies smell, see colorss, hears sounds, it becomes easy to understand how fruits and veggies, which are steeped in sunshine, let us to absorb it, through them, when we eat. By cons, meat, harmonizing to him, has a hapless visible radiation and, above all, it has rapid clip decay. That ‘s why it is non fit for human ingestion. In add-on, the carnal feels decease nearing when it arrives at the abattoir, so its secretory organs produce endocrines that are toxicant to those who so eat its meat.
Even solar energy contained in workss can feed us, but it is of import that, in idea, we get it to make all parts of our organic structure.
Silence is cardinal during the repast, to be able to concentrate, to be cognizant of the act that is accomplished. In this manner, the repast becomes a privileged minute of speculation.
Through this manner of meditating, we are present when the act is accomplished, thanks to the love and consciousness ; our organic structure is nourished wholly, even in its most elusive parts.
The pranic nutrient
There are presently 20,000 people on our planet who would feed entirelyprana( qi, chi, qi ) significance that they would feed entirely from the ambient energy, the visible radiation, at the disbursal of nutrient and even H2O.
Once, it was the instance of the great mystics as Marthe Robin or the Tibetan lamas.
Today, this phenomenon tends to distribute and impact individuals who are less “ religious” .
To do certain of it, scientists observed a adult male who fasted for 70 old ages. For this intent, he was filmed continuously for 15 yearss, 24 hours a twenty-four hours, continuously, to avoid misrepresentation. It was confirmed that he did non eat or imbibe during those 15 yearss, and besides he did non urinate or hold a intestine motion, that is even more distressing. Research workers have non yet figured out how this Indian could populate 83 old ages while he pretended non to eat or imbibe for more than 70 old ages.
You should cognize that today, persons go towards new energies, raising their vibrational degree to a greater spiritualty, which gives them less attractive force to the material elements.
This no uncertainty helps people in their version to the pranic nutriment. But it seems it is still excessively early for humanity to take this measure. And for the minute, we must be really careful before acquiring to the pranic nutriment. We must be surrounded and knowing about the topic. As some have tried and lost their wellness.
An interesting position on the topic is the film “light ” directed by Peter Arthur Straubinger.
Food plays a cardinal function in all faiths, hence some demands and utilizations: Judaic kosher, Halal Muslim nutrient, fasting among Christians. Each of the three monotheistic faiths has its ain norms or imposts.
But with modernness and secularisation, are these still respected?
When you believe, you do non eat anything, or anyhow. In most faiths, there is a strong nexus between physical nutrient and religious nutrient. Besides, the principles and prohibitions say something about Divinity, merely like the presence of nutrient in most ceremonials.
Awad Fouatih – Pluridisciplinary Professor, Aubervilliers, France
Pranic Food ( Gallic Edition ) by Henri Monfort
Populating Sufism: Tariqa Qadiriya Boutchichiya, islam- & A ; -soufisme